[RE-wrenches] Well siphon?

frenergy frenergy at psln.com
Sat Jan 29 23:41:56 EST 2022


Dang,

             Slow learner but I got it now.  I did some research and its 
pretty fascinating. Thanks

Bill

On 1/28/2022 6:28 AM, Jay wrote:
> Hi Bill
>
> Ok I’ll trybto explain 1 more time.
> Let’s take your example.
> Lake level at 100’, top of dam at 143’ output of the pipe at 0’
> The pipe is sch 80 steel,totally  filled with water, no air. There is 
> a check valve at the lake side which will allow lake water in but not 
> out, with the pipe intake below water level, and there is a valve at 
> the other end.
>
> When you open the valve at the bottom, that 143’ of water will start 
> to move out of the bottom of the pipe. It will be pulling up on the 
> 43’ from the top of dam down to the water. 33’ down from the dam top 
> on the lake side it will turn to vacuum leaving 10’ of water in the 
> pipe. The other 33’ above it will siphon over the top of the dam and 
> slowly make its way down the pipe.
>
> It cannot pull more than 33’ at sea level. Just the way it is.
>
> You can find good YouTube videos of water “boiling”at room temperature 
> under a vacuum, and that’s what happens in that pipe. That boiling 
> means that the water is no longer a liquid but a gas.
>
> Jay
>
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 8:09 PM, frenergy <frenergy at psln.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> This is good, I'm not yet willing to accept egg-defeat.  In my 
>> previously described scenario, the atmospheric pressure does not play 
>> a role because I'm not evacuating the air-filled pipe with the 
>> suction side of a pump which /would/ rely on atmospheric pressure to 
>> fill the pipe with water as the vacuum increases inside the pipe.
>>
>>             In my scenario the pipe going over the ridge is filled 
>> with water from the discharge side of a pump, it could be filled from 
>> anywhere in the pipe but there must be an exhaust only air vent at 
>> the highest point of the pipe. Both ends of the pipe must not allow 
>> any air in and one end of the pipe must be lower than the other.  
>> Because we are not dealing with a mere 1 atmosphere of pressure (or 
>> vacuum in this case), the "pull" of the water on the lower side of 
>> this pipe will cause tremendous crushing pressure on the _outside_ of 
>> this pipe that's drawing out of the well.  I think the physics is 
>> right but I'm not sure how practical it is.  The pipe has to be 
>> absolutely air-tight, completely full of water and extremely strong.
>>
>>             Now I'm really sticking my neck out.  There's gotta be an 
>> old physics teacher out there....help!
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On 1/27/2022 6:14 PM, Jay wrote:
>>> Hi Bill
>>>
>>> Sorry about the egg
>>>
>>> Here is some actual info to confirm what I and others have said.
>>>
>>> You cannot vacuum water any more than 33’ at sea level.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.nwcg.gov/course/ffm/squirt-water/35-drafting-guidelines
>>>
>>> Jay
>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 5:34 PM, frenergy <frenergy at psln.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>> OK, I'll gamble some egg on my face.  In this case though, you 
>>>> would not be "pulling a vacuum" with air (a gas) involved.  If you 
>>>> can fill the entire pipe with a liquid (water), the water that's 
>>>> down slope of the water in the well on the other side of the ridge 
>>>> it would pull the water out of the well and up over that ridge /as 
>>>> long as/ the pipe exit is below the dynamic water level in the well 
>>>> and the pipe's intake.
>>>>
>>>>             The caveat: the pipe would have to be filled by pumping 
>>>> out of the well (one time to set-up this siphon) and the exit end 
>>>> of the pipe would have to be closed to be able to fill the pipe 
>>>> /completely/, which would require an air vent (exhaust vent only, 
>>>> not intake) at the highest point of the pipe going over the ridge.  
>>>> A valve would also be required at the exit end for flow control and 
>>>> prevent the siphon from drawing the well dry.  The pipe would have 
>>>> to rated to handle the crushing force of the vacuum being pulled on 
>>>> the uphill section of pipe after it left the well. There could 
>>>> absolutely not be any leaks in the pipe.
>>>>
>>>>             I hope my seat-of-the-pants physics is working today.
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>> Feather River Solar Electric
>>>> Bill Battagin, Owner
>>>> 4291 Nelson St.
>>>> Taylorsville, CA 95983
>>>> 530.284.7849
>>>> CA Lic 874049
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/27/2022 2:28 PM, Darryl Thayer wrote:
>>>>> Yes, but if the rise is greater than about 30 feet (25 feet even) 
>>>>> the water head is greater than atmospheric and the water will draw 
>>>>> a vacuum in the pipe.  These numbers depend upon the location 
>>>>> (elevation) and temperature of the water.
>>>>> for example at 15,000 feet the atmosphere is about 1/2 or sea 
>>>>> level, meaning the water column will break at 15 feet of head.  
>>>>> (from my high school physics, this is the scale height) so that at 
>>>>> 7500 feet the water column is a maximum of 3/4 x 30 feet or 22 
>>>>> feet.  this is from memory and mine is not so good.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 3:51 PM William Miller 
>>>>> <william at millersolar.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Colleagues:
>>>>>
>>>>>     All of our water pumping customers to date have been pumping
>>>>>     water to tanks higher in elevation than the well-head.  Just
>>>>>     now I am looking at a system pumping to a pond that is lower
>>>>>     than the well-head and lower even than the bottom of the
>>>>>     well.  The 300’ well has the head at 1200’ elevation and
>>>>>     pumping to a pond at 800’ elevation. The line goes over a
>>>>>     1500’ ridge.  If there were nothing impeding the water flow,
>>>>>     would it not siphon to the pond?
>>>>>
>>>>>     Has anyone seen the basic physics available being used to
>>>>>     advantage?
>>>>>
>>>>>     Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>>     William
>>>>>
>>>>>     Miller Solar
>>>>>
>>>>>     17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422
>>>>>
>>>>>     805-438-5600
>>>>>
>>>>>     www.millersolar.com <http://www.millersolar.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>     CA Lic. 773985
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> 
>> 	Virus-free. www.avast.com 
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> 
>>
>>
>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>>
>> Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>
>> Change listserver email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try 
>> the other:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>
>> Check out or update participant bios:
>> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> Pay optional member dues here:http://re-wrenches.org
>
> List Address:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
-- 
Feather River Solar Electric
Bill Battagin, Owner
4291 Nelson St.
Taylorsville, CA 95983
530.284.7849
CA Lic 874049
www.frenergy.net


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20220129/00bf2872/attachment.htm>


More information about the RE-Wrenches mailing list