[RE-wrenches] KAUAI CHARITY CASE

Dan Fink danbob88 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 16:54:41 PDT 2016


FLAs. Sounds like a bad candidate for NiFe.
NiFe does give you the extra DOD down to 80%, but can the inverter handle
the surge loads at such a low battery voltage? I have that issue with my
12vdc office system; I can really only go down to 50% DOD until the fridge
surge kicks the magnum inverter offline at night from LVD. Fine during
daytime of course.

Dan Fink
Adjunct Professor of Solar Energy Technology, Ecotech Institute
IREC Certified Instructor™ for:
~ PV Installation Professional
~ Small Wind Installer
Executive Director, Buckville Energy
NABCEP Registered Continuing Education Providers™
970.672.4342



On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dana <dana at solarwork.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jay I have not used I-E batteries & This is the direct result of my
> Kauai charity case client online shopping.
>
>
>
> She was sold an undersized/over promised system: 50% of req’d PV &
> basically one days storage of T-105 style batteries. She has burned up 2
> sets of batteries and has had several of installers try to steer her to
> total replacement with a variety of systems.
>
>
>
> She has an Outback VFX3624 dual inverter system, no problems there &  ½
> the PV she needs. The equipment originally installed in a mini shed a ways
> from the house that could have been installed under a high covered porch on
> the ocean side of her house.
>
>
>
> Her health is an issue, she lives free in a house that was a gift [she got
> to build it], & there is no utility available.
>
> She is not able to afford me to fly there [ I just moved to ID & have
> started my new house here additionally]  & I have to say she has run into
> a # of opportunistic installers that think she is easy pickings.
>
>
>
> She needs 1200 watts of additional PV & 760-900 AHR @ 24 VDC of LOW TO NO
> MAINTENANCE long life battery & moving the power equipment to under a
> covered porch.
>
>
>
> Anyone with integrity free to assist?
>
>
>
> Please contact me off line for a discussion.  Thanks
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Dana Orzel
>
> Great Solar Works, Inc -  NABCEP # 051112-136
>
> dana at solarwork.com  - www.solarwork.biz <http://www.solarwork.com>
>
> *O* - 970.626.5253    *F* - 970.626.4140   c *- *208.721.7003
>
> *"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988**"  *
>
>
>
> *From:* jay [mailto:jay.peltz at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 9:32 AM
> *To:* dana at solarwork.com Orzel
> *Subject:* offsite
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Dana,
>
>
>
> I can go into great detail about all the negatives on NiFe batteries.
>
> But if this is a charity case, I don’t know how you can even think about
> them.
>
>
>
> First off, while yes you can take them down quite deep w/o damage, but
> then you also don’t have much storage either.
>
> So I don’t agree with the logic, I feel its based on trying to sell a
> smaller than useful battery requiring more generator run time.
>
>
>
> 400 amp hr at 24v nife is $7700 plus shipping.
>
>
>
> 800 amp hr L-16’s are $2200?
>
> really good ones with 2500 cycles to 50% are $3200
>
>
>
> I sure don’t recommend them.
>
> Let me know if you want more info.
>
>
>
> jay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *"Dana" <dana at solarwork.com>
>
> *Subject: [RE-wrenches] Battery Watt hours FLA VS Iron Edison Batteries*
>
> *Date: *October 14, 2016 at 6:55:43 AM PDT
>
> *To: *"'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
> *Reply-To: *RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
>
>
> Good Morning All,
>
>
>
> I have a charity case client that needs 760 to 900 AHR at 24 VDC. I have
> installed HUP Solar One Batteries for 20+ years and do not have any
> experience with the Iron Edison battery. My client went to Iron Edison &
> was told that 360 AHR at 24 VDC would cover the same AHR as a 760 to 900
> AHR in FLA.  I understand you can use the IE deeper typically than a FLA.
>
>
>
> Math is math to me & how I have sized [successfully for years] Is there
> something I am missing or has my client been misinformed?
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Dana Orzel
>
> Great Solar Works, Inc -  NABCEP # 051112-136
>
> dana at solarwork.com  - www.solarwork.biz <http://www.solarwork.com/>
>
> *O* - 970.626.5253    *F* - 970.626.4140   c *- *208.721.7003
>
> *"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988**"  *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.
> re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.
> org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20161014/bd8d2fe4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list