[RE-wrenches] Parallel Wire combining
Larry
larry at starlightsolar.com
Tue Dec 2 15:32:58 PST 2014
Hey boB,
This is the reference table I was using. They show 325 AWG and 325kCM
refer to the same diameter cable but I should have used kcm for clarity.
If all insulation/temp rating is the same we are back to my original
question. Anyone else able to explain this? To be safe I am leaning
toward using the combined CM number to size for current rather than 3
times the ampacity as that just makes no sense to me.
On 12/2/14 3:54 PM, boB at midnitesolar.com wrote:
>
> The "area" of the conductor will be 3 times and you would think that
> the NEC Ampacity would also be 3 times
> that of one conductor. But one LARGE conductor with the same area
> might not be as high as you think
> because of insulation. I would think that ampacity of 3 cables in
> parallel would be 3 times. But probably
> not when you take a single cable of the 3X area out of the NEC table.
> (I haven't looked at this to verify)
>
> Also, Larry, 325 AWG 750 AWG (gauge) wire is a bit too small for
> this, don't you think ?
>
> I know... You mean circular mils...
> boB
>
>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20141202/77064561/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jbcacchi.
Type: image/png
Size: 104519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20141202/77064561/attachment-0005.png>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list