[RE-wrenches] Kyocera KC 120-1R = 102 Watt

Marv Dargatz Marv.Dargatz at solaredge.com
Tue Jul 3 17:14:35 PDT 2012


OK, got it.

The reason I asked, is some people in the past have used Isc and Voc to attempt a power calculation.  Obviously very erroneous results with this.

I agree that the labeling, as you've described it, is a bit misleading.  Perhaps they just had a dyslexic person running the labeling machine.  To some, 120 and 102 might look the same.  I see errors like this way too frequently.

Have you tested the modules for actual power output?


See ya!

Marv
Director of Technology and Support, North America
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Tech Support North America:  +877.360.5292
Mobile: +530.392.0356

From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Wallace Stahle
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 3:36 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Kyocera KC 120-1R = 102 Watt


On Jun 28, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Marv Dargatz wrote:


What is "peak volts" and "peak amps"?

The only ratings that should apply here are Vmp and Imp.  Plus, of course, deratings for temperature and correction for irradiance and angle of incidence.
 See ya!

Marv



I multiplied the labeled peak volts x the peak amps at STC.  That is, using the stated data from label on back of module.


Uh yeah, up here in Northern California, or at least the small padded room I'm in, peak volts and peak amps are the same as Vmp and Imp. I just got sloppy being way tired when I posted that.

Even with that fuzzyness explained,  the KC120-1R modules being sent as replacements are actually LABELED on back as putting out 102 watts at STC  if you multiply the.... stated on the label.
Yet it is called KC120-1R   That is shocking and represents deliberate deception in my opinion.


If any of you have replaced these faulty KC120s with KC120-1R then I encourage you to find out what the labeled Vmp x Imp is.

If you want to open a can of worms that is.

It may be these two are an anomaly. I am having the recipient of the batch in question confirm on those he has.

Happy trails,

Wallace Stahle
Future Electric Energy Co
P O Box 236
Willits, CA 95490
future at pacific.net<mailto:future at pacific.net>
CA Lic.# C10-762093
707-459-0474




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and its attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure or any type of use under applicable law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee, agent, or representative responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply immediately to the sender.
P  Please think of the environment before printing this email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120704/028e4eb3/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list