[RE-wrenches] Outback "F"ware
R Ray Walters
ray at solarray.com
Fri Oct 23 12:11:07 PDT 2009
We use Square D load centers, and recently I've used a Reliance 60 amp
transfer switch, which was only $100, breakers, busbar, etc included.
We use the super flex 3/4" conduit from Midnite, and it makes adapting
from the Outback AC side easy, w/o needing their ACA. Recently we
decided to use the Flex AC box for a more complicated system, but
we're looking for anything now that would be UL listed for AC, and
accept DIN rail breakers. I considered using a combiner box, but
they're not UL listed for AC.(at least not Midnite's) or possibly if
SqD made a 3 pole 6 to 12 space QO box, that might work as well. (The
3 pole 3 space box is too small, IMO)
R. Walters
ray at solarray.com
Solar Engineer
On Oct 23, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William Miller wrote:
> Ray:
>
> I do feel your pain, especially about the price. We had proposed
> using two XW Power Distribution Panel on one job and those are even
> more expensive! $500.00 plus for an empty box!
>
> Here's one specific complaint: When using Flexware, each QOU
> breaker needs a separate lead to the bus for feed. Too bad we can't
> have a bus bar for plug on breakers.
>
> How are you configuring the system without an Outback AC cabinet?
> We used to use standard load centers with the SW systems before the
> Outback BOS arrived (http://millersolar.com/Portfolio/Inverters/battery_iinverters/full_size_photos/3_input_sw.JPG
> ).
>
> This can be done with the FX inverter, but the KO is so far from the
> back plane. I stopped by the Outback office years ago while in
> Washington and met with Chris and boB and the boys (went to the pub
> with them as well!). I emphasized that I would like to see the AC
> KO a standard distance from the back plane to allow connection via
> standard offset to an off-the-shelf load center. Never happened...
>
> William Miller
>
>
>
> At 10:23 AM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
>> Thanks Todd;
>>
>> That was my point: I still install more Outback inverters and
>> controllers than anything else, its just frustrating to see a
>> product line supposedly move forward, when in reality it's harder
>> to use.
>> I understand William's points as well, if we're doing a multiple
>> inverter system were still using Flex ware, it just should work
>> better than that, and cost less. It won't be long before another
>> manu picks this up and gives us what we need. I have two power
>> boards being built side by side, both dual Outback inverter
>> systems, but one were NOT doing the AC with Fware, and its going
>> faster, and will be 100s of $$ cheaper.
>>
>> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20091023/aeab06f0/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list