[RE-wrenches] building permits for PV
Joel Davidson
joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net
Wed Dec 10 07:31:45 PST 2008
Dana,
See http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/global_warming/fee_study.htm
I think there were other lists of permit requirements on this list but I can not find them. Perhaps someone can suggest a search method.
Joel Davidson
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Truitt
To: RE-wrenches
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] building permits for PV
Dana,
Washington DC, Baltimore MD, San Francisco, Berkeley and Oakland CA - none require "roof footing inspections". However, one of our local AHJs does require a letter on company letterhead stating our roof guarantee - maybe something you could try. We are also required to get structural engineer stamped drawings in most jurisdictions in Maryland.
This document has some info you might find useful:
http://www.solartech.org/index.php/about/29-objectives/18-buildingpermits
But when faced with unreasonable AHJs I don't think any way foreword is better than just sitting down with the Head of Permitting and explaining exactly how you install, preferably with visual aids. And since yours seems to be especially worried about leaks make sure you have a good counterflashed waterproofing solution to show him. Tell him you want to work with him but that many solar installs are completed in a day or two and to accommodate an inspection in the middle severely impacts your project timeline.
And of course it couldn't hurt to bring a box of donuts.
Good luck!
Andrew Truitt
Standard Solar
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dana Brandt <dana at ecotechenergy.com> wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback. Sounds like there's a ton of variation from one jurisdiction to another. Would you all be willing to send me a list of large cities you've worked in that do not require a building permit? I'd like to use that to make a case against the requirement.
I just got back from the inspection which verified that - yes indeed, there are L-feet and rails on the roof. Seems pretty silly...
Thanks again,
Dana
--
Dana Brandt
Ecotech Energy Systems, LLC
www.ecotechenergy.com
dana at ecotechenergy.com
360.510.0433
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Paul Israel <paul at sunlightsolar.com> wrote:
Dana,
Firstly we all truly sympathize, I have never heard of that one!
Not one building department - has required that. We have installed in Oregon, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Reno - Nevada, and Massachusetts.
We are inspected consistently for concrete pours (rebar/pads/ground mounts/pole mounts). For most roofs in CT we are usually required to have an Engineers Stamp for the layout relative to the rafter loading. It depends on the jurisdiction or whether they had their coffee. It is random.
I would try and push the manufacturer's installation instructions or get a local engineering stamp on the layout as an alternative.
On a lighter note, make sure to leave some exposed wet caulk. After messing up their car, paperwork, and a couple layers of skin they surely won't want to do that again.
Good luck and let us know how it works out.
Paul N. Israel, President
paul at sunlightsolar.com
www.sunlightsolar.com
541/389-3480 (Oregon)
203/878-9123 x103 (CT)
860/617-6527 (Cell)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Dana Brandt
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 5:46 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] building permits for PV
Hi all,
Until recently, we've only been required to have an electrical permit for flush-mounted PV systems. The city has now decided to require building permits for all PV systems and wants to come out and inspect our L-feet attachments and rails before the modules can go up. This seems crazy to me. What are other jurisdictions requiring? I'd love some information I can take to the city showing that other jurisdictions aren't requiring this type of process.
Thanks a lot,
Dana
--
Dana Brandt
Ecotech Energy Systems, LLC
www.ecotechenergy.com
dana at ecotechenergy.com
360.510.0433
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
--
"Don't get me wrong: I love nuclear energy! It's just that I prefer fusion to fission. And it just so happens that there's an enormous fusion reactor safely banked a few million miles from us. It delivers more than we could ever use in just about 8 minutes. And it's wireless!"
~William McDonough
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20081210/54bf31b8/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list