Battery charging with XW series equipment [RE-wrenches]
Drake Chamberlin
Drake.Chamberlin at redwoodalliance.org
Thu Jul 10 09:25:24 PDT 2008
<x-flowed>
Is there any chance that Xantrex could be persuaded to rework the old
SW Series? It was almost the inverter we needed, with a few
maddening glitches. An updated FET board, better grid tie interface,
and silent sell, and it could be the inverter we have been waiting
for. Maybe we could think of a few more rubs to address, such as a
user friendly DC box.
Drake
At 02:59 PM 7/9/2008, you wrote:
>Colleagues:
>
>We installed our first XW system recently and it has caused some
>questions and consternation. The client is very technically
>inclined (he owns a small telephone company) and has graciously
>agreed to work with us to familiarize with the equipment. Here is a
>list of question/concerns:
>
>1. The 24 IBE batteries we have do not appear to be receiving a
>full charge. At-rest voltage caves quickly at sundown to 48 or
>less. I have observed the two-stage charge cycle performed by the
>XW charge controllers and I wonder if this is really superior to
>three stage charging. Comments?
>
>2. The charge routine performed by the XW inverter is also
>suspect. Apparently there is no way to require a specific
>absorption duration. According to tech support, the absorption
>timer is simply a maximum timer and that absorption ends when the
>charge tapers down to 2% of the battery AH value. We see the
>generator auto start and then shut off in about an hour. For a 1600
>AH battery bank, this seem too short a time frame to really get a
>full charge. Should we increase the absorption voltage?? Comments?
>
>3. The programmed variables for a number of the functions were
>blank. For example, the generator voltage start numbers (for 24
>hour, 2 hour, etc) were not empty. This puts a lot of pressure on
>the installer to insert parameters where one would usually find them
>already programmed. The possibility is high that the installer
>might miss an important parameter and have to drive back just for
>programming. I thought that the default parameters for the SW were
>excellent and I encourage Xantrex to pre-program with these
>values. It may be also that I have older software and the new
>software has these values?
>
>4. What is the difference between newer version of the software
>and the older versions?
>
>Your replies are much appreciated.
- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: re-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list