[RE-wrenches] Grounding Top of Pole Mount Array with a Ufer
Ray
ray at solarray.com
Fri Jun 25 12:16:18 EDT 2021
Copper can get a pretty good oxide layer on it as well, but I'm not
versed in the science enough to know how any of that effects the
conductivity. Instead, I assume that the NEC has investigated corrosion,
and so we just follow the code. For plate electrodes (250.52(A)(7)), it
just specifies dimensions and thickness, and specifically mentions bare
iron or steel. 250.52(A)(3)(/1/) for Concrete encased electrodes (UFER)
also allows bare steel reinforcing rod, while section (/2/) allows your
#4 copper UFER.
Lacking further information, I just go with the code, and my own ground
impedance measurements over the years. My small sampling of
measurements has found steel rebar grounds and large steel pipe (4"D and
larger) to be under 25 ohms, while I have measured copper coated rods as
high as 700 ohms in dry soil. I haven't measure copper UFER or compared
it to steel, so again, I don't know. It might be better than steel, but
all are allowed by code.
Ultimately it might come down to soil and weather conditions for
different areas?
Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
On 6/25/21 10:35 AM, Dana Orzel wrote:
> That’s why we use the Ufer, our AHJ assumes that once a layer of rust develops this is not valid...........
>
>
>
> Dana Orzel Great Solar Works, Inc.
> C - 208.721.7003 dana at solarwork.com
> Idaho Contractor - # 028765 Idaho PV # 028374
> NABCEP # 051112-136 www.greatsolarworks.com
> "Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On Behalf Of Ray
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 4:51 PM
> To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Grounding Top of Pole Mount Array with a Ufer
>
> We always put our assumption in our plan notes, based on our interpretation of 250.52(A)(7). AHJs have never questioned it, and we also tie the pole to any rebar, so its all one big happy grounding electrode.
>
> Ray Walters
> Remote Solar
> 303 505-8760
>
> On 6/24/21 6:49 PM, frenergy wrote:
>> Ray,
>>
>> I couldn't agree more, its been my experience over the
>> years that using 20 feet of #4 rebar in a building's footing was
>> kosher and accepted NEC 250.52(3). There's a heck of a lot more
>> surface area in 8" pipe 5-6 feet into the earth than rebar in a
>> foundation footing. The ground at the bottom of the pole footing is
>> also more likely to be damper. Our AHJ has always accepted the steel
>> pole as a ground rod....common sense prevails sometimes.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> Feather River Solar Electric
>> Bill Battagin, Owner
>> 4291 Nelson St.
>> Taylorsville, CA 95983
>> 530.284.7849
>> CA Lic 874049
>> www.frenergy.net
>>
>> On 6/24/2021 7:31 AM, Ray wrote:
>>> Usually a steel pole in concrete has enough surface area to qualify
>>> as a plate electrode under 250.52(A)(7). It needs to be at least 2
>>> sq ft and 1/4" thick, and have an electrically conductive surface. So
>>> we just drill and tap our ground connection into the pole, near the
>>> combiner box.
>>>
>>> Ray Walters
>>> Remote Solar
>>> 303 505-8760
>>>
>>> On 6/24/21 8:16 AM, Dana Orzel wrote:
>>>> For all of our free standing arrays we now use a Ufer clamp to the
>>>> rebar either cage or just anti spin rebar that is welded to the pole
>>>> in the concrete, with #4 braided copper up to the pole combiner box,
>>>> inverter, etc. for our ground.
>>>> With a pole mount & a concrete base it is way easier & less
>>>> expensive than a ground rod, & the inspector seems happier with this
>>>> approach.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dana Orzel Great Solar Works, Inc.
>>>> C - 208.721.7003 dana at solarwork.com Idaho
>>>> Contractor - # 028765 Idaho PV # 028374 NABCEP # 051112-136
>>>> www.greatsolarworks.com "Responsible Technologies for Responsible
>>>> People since 1988"
>>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On
>>>> Behalf Of palumbo131m at gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 9:33 PM
>>>> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Top of Pole Mount Array on Ledge
>>>>
>>>> Ben,
>>>> There is a way if the ledge is solid and true. Twice I have done the
>>>> following with ledge at 18” to 24” below grade. Excavate down to
>>>> ledge, drill down into the ledge and you will determine the
>>>> suitability of the following method. Drill for a pattern of many
>>>> rebar penetrations in to the ledge. Drill to a reasonable depth (as
>>>> deep into the ledge as you are able) in my case it was based on our
>>>> drilling tool and bit length capabilities. We used a large sono
>>>> tube. 42” as a recall, both of these jobs were over 12 years ago and
>>>> my recall on the exact size may be off.
>>>> Determine the best adhesive product to use in your drilled holes for
>>>> the rebar, again my memory fails as to what we used based on
>>>> recommendation from a local civil engineer. The sono tube height
>>>> above grade was determined to be 2’ for one TPM12 and 3.5’ above
>>>> grade for a TPM16. Depth down to the ledge determines how high above
>>>> grade you need the concrete footing/base. Use rebar lengths that
>>>> will end a few inches below the finished surface. For grounding you
>>>> can coil up ground wire and lay it on the surface of the ledge
>>>> before your concrete pour. I ran the ground wire through a short
>>>> length of 1/2” or 3/4” PVC conduit, to protect the copper ground
>>>> wire where it comes out of the concrete. Place the conduit coming
>>>> out of the concrete with the ground wire just to the side of where
>>>> the mounting plate base for the TPM will be and fill the PVC conduit
>>>> with a good caulk sealer to keep air and water out of this hole as a
>>>> nexus of concrete, and air will corrode the copper. The TPM’s for
>>>> those two jobs were made of 8” SCHD 80 steel, we had a large plate
>>>> welded to the bottom with 4 vertical side supports on the pipe up
>>>> about a foot. Place the appropriate sized anchor bolts in the
>>>> concrete pour to match your TPM base. Both of these TPM’s have
>>>> worked out well over the years. Local conditions will determine the
>>>> suitability of this method.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20210625/17aec9ff/attachment.htm>
More information about the RE-Wrenches
mailing list