[RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown

Ray Walters ray at solarray.com
Tue Mar 15 13:56:49 PDT 2016


Hi Bill;

First, I didn't intend to "shoot the messenger".  I have appreciated 
your many contributions to the PV industry, and enjoyed your education 
courses over the years.  Thank You.
However, 'PV system circuit' is not 'self defined' as you stated. By 
that same interpretation, a single GT system could then cause an entire 
city to fall under the requirements of rapid disconnect, because a 
portion of everyone's power would be coming from PV. Obviously, we have 
to draw a line somewhere sensible just where the photovoltaic circuit 
stops and the other circuits start.  A modern off grid power system 
actually consists of numerous circuits each subject to its own rules, 
wire and breaker sizing, etc.

A reasonable interpretation is thus: if you remove the PV from the 
system, the remaining components are not part of the 'PV system 
circuit'.  We can all agree that an inverter generator system with out 
PV is not subject to 690, but 705.  Adding a single PV module should not 
suddenly change the requirements for every other circuit in the house. 
Disconnect the PV module in compliance with 690.12, and the rest of the 
system should no longer be considered part of the PV Circuit.
690.12 should accomplish the same result as previous, slower methods to 
deenergize a PV array (blanket over the array, or wait till the sun goes 
down)  Our design does the same in an instant: push the Birdhouse button 
and all Photovoltaic power beyond the array is off, just like we turned 
the sun itself off.

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 3/15/2016 11:10 AM, billbrooks7 at sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Ray,
>
> I guess I have to step in after that acknowledgement. PV system circuit is a
> self-defined term and therefore cannot be defined unless you are going to
> develop a meaning that is different from the self-definition. It means ANY
> circuit in a PV system. This includes battery and stand-alone circuits in
> the 2014 NEC.
>
> The language of the 2014 NEC was a compromise between the fire service and
> the PV industry.  Originally, the language required essentially module-level
> shutdown. I raised the concern with the PV industry to get them involved
> since most were not paying attention at the time. This language was
> developed and intended to cover all circuits in a PV system. In the 2014
> NEC, batteries are part of a PV system and therefore fall under this
> requirement.
>
> In the 2017 NEC, we were very careful to carve out all batteries and loads,
> that were previously part of PV systems, and place them in their own
> articles. Don't shoot the messenger on this one and don't think for a minute
> that I alone made this requirement or am alone in interpreting it in this
> way. I did author this compromise with other representatives of the PV
> industry so I think I know what the intent was.
>
> It is understandably difficult for battery systems and I would try to keep
> battery circuits as short as possible. The 5-feet was intended to match the
> requirement of 690.71(H)--which is further evidence of the intent of the
> 2014 NEC.
>
> The 2017 NEC removes batteries from the requirement, but they still cannot
> backfeed the PV array. Energy storage systems (Article 706) will have their
> own requirements in time--that is guaranteed.
>
> Bill.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On
> Behalf Of Ray Walters
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:02 AM
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown
>
> Greetings Esteemed Wrenches:
>
> I've just heard back from our inspector here in Colorado, and we are still
> being required to disconnect the batteries under 690.12.  No where in 690.12
> are batteries mentioned, nor in the appropriate 690.71 section that deals
> with batteries.  The entire reasoning behind this is based on a single
> article written by a single person: Bill Brooks.  I have contacted both
> Outback and Magnum on this issue, and their engineers are unaware that rapid
> shutdown applies.
> My interpretation is that I could install an inverter and battery system
> that was charged from a generator, and we would not need any rapid shutdown
> at all.  But according to Bill, as soon as I put a single solar module into
> the system, suddenly the entire system becomes PV? The problem lies with the
> term 'PV System circuit'  used in 690.12.  690.2 Defines 'PV Output
> circuit', and 'PV source circuit', but there is no 'PV system circuit'
> defined.  690.12 therefore uses an undefined term.
> Our design uses 2 inverters, so if we used Midnite's E panel with their
> remote trip breakers, the 2nd inverter would be more than 5 ft from the
> batteries.  If we used Magnum or Outback DC disconnects (that would comply
> with the 5 ft rule specified in 690.71) they don't offer remote trip.
> We have a Midnite Rapid disconnect Combiner on the roof with the Birdhouse,
> so we are complying with 690.12, it should not be applied to batteries
> though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> R.Ray Walters
> CTO, Solarray, Inc
> Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
> Licensed Master Electrician
> Solar Design Engineer
> 303 505-8760
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>




More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list