[RE-wrenches] Flashed Roof-attachment systems

Benn Kilburn benn at skyfireenergy.com
Wed Aug 5 17:53:03 PDT 2015


I've been pretty satisfied with the Kinetic flashing/Lfoot and rail system. Their 3" Lfoot results in the rail height being btwn 4-5".  They have other Lfoot heights available. 

I don't have a flashing handy, but they are btwn 8-10" wide. The only potential for a leak path I've ever seen is not a result of the flashing not being wide enough but from not being tall enough, however, this is easily remedied by not locating the base/flashing too high on the course/row of shingles and, if the row is wavy/uneven, having to trim the shingle around the raises portion of the flashing. 

Benn Kilburn
SkyFire Energy Inc. 
780-906-7807


> On Aug 5, 2015, at 4:30 PM, "William Miller" <william.miller at millersolar.com> wrote:
> 
> Friends:
>  
> We have been using the Eco-Fasten flashings for comp roofs.  We have a few complaints:
>  
> 1.    We have been using the Eco-Fasten blocks and Unirac serrated L-feet.  There is not enough room below the foot to install the neoprene washer, the block, the bonded washer, the washer, the lock washer and the nut.  The L-foot runs into the nut.
> 2.    The flashing is not wide enough (12” high by 8” wide).  If the flashing ends up on the split between two 3-tab shingles there is an obvious leak path.
> 3.    The company does not offer a decent cut-sheet.  This is crucial to the permit authoring process.
> 4.    We can’t seem to get the rail height correct.  We would prefer about 4” to the top of the rail.
> a.    The L102-3 results in a rail height of 3”.
> b.    The L102-6 is 6” rail height—this is too high.
> c.    The block with the Unirac serrated L-foot results in 3-3/4”, but the combination of parts does not really fit and it is expensive.
>  
> We have also tried the Iron Ridge and it seems to offer some improvements:
> 1.    The flashing is larger (12” by 12”).
> 2.    The rail height is about 3-1/4”, still a little low.
>  
> I posted some photos and comments on our web site:
> http://www.millersolar.com/MillerSolar/case_studies/Flashed_roof_attachments/FlashedRoofAttachements.html
>  
> Do any of you have any suggestions for a flashed foot system with a rail height of about 4” and a wider flashing?  Do any of you have any comments on products you like or don’t like for our review?
>  
> Thanks in advance.
>  
> William Miller
>  
> <image003.jpg>
> Lic 773985
> millersolar.com
> 805-438-5600
>  
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150805/816098c9/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list