[RE-wrenches] Using the North Facing Roof

Tue Jul 28 10:50:00 PDT 2015

In the Caribbean, low tilt roofs that face North can work very well, we (16
degrees) are below the Tropic of Cancer (23 degrees) and the sun is in the
North for much of the year.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, <billbrooks7 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Jarmo,
>
>
>
> The sun’s geometry is not nearly that simple. To understand the impact of
> north-facing arrays, you have to perform a simulation. PV:WATTS does this
> just fine and it is easy to show that a 18-degreed North-facing tilt
> produces 75% of a perfect 30-degree south-facing array. Far more than your
> assumption of 50%.
>
>
>
> To compare 15-degrees South to 15-degrees North, the numbers are slightly
> better at 77%. We are going to see a lot of north-facing arrays once people
> understand that low tilt angles are very forgiving on North slopes. Steep
> slopes are a totally different story and you have to run the numbers….
>
>
>
> Bill.
>
>
>
> *From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jarmo.Venalainen at schneider-electric.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:04 AM
> *To:* RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Using the North Facing Roof
>
>
>
> I did a slide on the effect of North facing modules.  For even a fairly
> aggressive rotation North as shown, the effect is "only" a 50% reduction.
>
> The questions of whether or not to do it, are,
>
> - is the mounting structure simpler, lower cost
> - security against wind
> - can I put a larger array on the roof  (typically yes, if you make back
> to back pyramid shaped structures)
> - overall, what is the cost versus benefit
>
> JARMO
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> *Jarmo Venalainen*  |  * Schneider Electric   |  Xantrex Brand*  |
> *CANADA*  |   *Sales Application Engineer*
> *Phone:* +604-422-2528  |   *Tech Support:* 800-670-0707  |   *Mobile:*
> +604-505-0291
> *Email:* jarmo.venalainen at schneider-electric.com  |   *Site:*
> www.Xantrex.com <http://www.xantrex.com/>  |   *Address:* 3700 Gilmore
> Way, Burnaby, BC V5G4M1
>
> <http://www.xantrexrebate.com/>
>
> <http://www.xantrex.com/>
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/Xantrex>
>
> <https://twitter.com/Xantrex>
>
> <https://twitter.com/Xantrex>
>
>
>
>
> *** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
>
> From:
>
> "Peter Parrish" <peter.parrish at calsolareng.com>
>
> To:
>
> "'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>,
>
> Date:
>
> 07/28/2015 12:22 AM
>
> Subject:
>
> [RE-wrenches] Using the North Facing Roof
>
> Sent by:
>
> "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> I recently read a short piece that caught me up short, and I quote:
>
> “The fast dropping cost of solar, while a huge boon to the adoption of
> solar PV, has counter-intuitively altered design parameters. No longer is
> the north-facing roof considered unusable because limited application in
> less-than optimal orientations can still show a positive net benefit.
> Arrays are thus designed now with elements or sub-arrays in these
> locations, increasing overall kW installation while reducing the energy
> production per capacity installed. This might have been anticipated based
> on sheer economic analysis from a users perspective, but so long has solar
> been expensive that these less optimal orientations were never seriously
> considered.”
>
> I doubt that the individual who wrote this piece came to these conclusions
> him/herself. Does anyone know of a recent article that argued this
> perspective? Is this an emerging design practice? If so, I’d like to know
> more about it.
>
> -          Peter
>
> Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D.
> President, SolarGnosis
> 1107 Fair Oaks Ave., Suite 351
> South Pasadena, CA 91030
> (323) 839-6108
> petertor at pobox.com
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>   [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>

-- 
Chris Mason
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer™
Solar Design Engineer
Generac Generators Industrial technician

www.cometsolar.com <http://www.cometenergysystems.com>
264.235.5670
869.662.5670
Skype: netconcepts
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1869 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0020.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0021.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 4274 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0022.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 141 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 7678 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0023.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1897 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150728/2b2dbb29/attachment-0024.gif>