[RE-wrenches] Wire management devices

Christopher Warfel cwarfel at entech-engineering.com
Tue Oct 14 07:01:50 PDT 2014


Thanks Rob, We have been using Unirac for many years and slow to change 
(since we have so much of it in inventory). I think with the difficulty 
of pv module disconnects now, and good wire management, a barrier is 
really a solution looking for a problem.  I'll take a look.  Thank you 
again.  Chris
On 10/13/2014 3:54 PM, RE Ellison wrote:
> I have mentioned in the past, look into US Solar Mounts, The wire management is built in!
>
> They have several different styles of mounts and many of them have wire management built into the frames
>
>   Custom-built for each install so you tell him what you're using and what you need and they will tell you what will work best
>
> Another product that's made in the USA!
> Bob Ellison
>
>
> Bob Ellison
>
>> On Oct 13, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Christopher Warfel <cwarfel at entech-engineering.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am well aware of all the possibilities of danger in many aspects of life.  This is not a main one in my opinion, and given that there are no good solutions indicates to me that it is mostly an unsolvable problem unless you wish to be impractical.  All I asked for were products that could provide a solution. .  I have inspected in several states with solar programs that will not enforce securing electrical enclosures in living spaces that have access to 240 v. I even seen this situation in a children's play room.
>> I think that is more than a little more serious issue.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/13/2014 11:27 AM, William Miller wrote:
>>> Christopher:
>>>
>>> I believe strongly that the code requirement to protect PV wires from
>>> unauthorized personnel is justified.  Ground mount arrays are essentially
>>> jungle gyms and could attract children to climb.  If a 50 pound child
>>> inadvertently swings on a PV cable across a sharp metal edge the insulation
>>> could easily be compromised.  The current limited nature of PV means the
>>> current will sink through the short until the short is opened, leaving up to
>>> 600 volts at fatal amperage exposed to the touch.  Inadequate ground fault
>>> interruption technology does little to prevent the problem.
>>>
>>> You cannot legally install a convenience receptacle at any height above
>>> ground with the individual conductors exposed, so why should one be allowed
>>> to install PV with individual conductors readily accessible?
>>>
>>> I grant you that shielding PV wiring on a ground mount is a difficult
>>> process.  It is very unfortunate that the industry has been allowed to
>>> evolve without developing decent wire management hardware in the process.
>>>
>>> If you are not aware of the work we have done on wire management solutions,
>>> you might visit our website where we share all of our ideas.  We are giving
>>> away trade secrets, but I feel a moral obligation to help everyone in the
>>> industry deliver a safe product.
>>>
>>> Most sincerely,
>>>
>>> William Miller
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lic 773985
>>> millersolar.com
>>> 805-438-5600
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Christopher Warfel
>>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 5:56 AM
>>> To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Wire management devices
>>>
>>> Thanks all, I don't see a good solution to what I think is a non-existent
>>> problem.  I believe that anyone who wants to pull apart dc subarray
>>> conductors is attempting to vandalize. It's not easy to do, and you really
>>> have to be wondering why someone would even try. Why don't we put all
>>> electrical outlets 8 feet off the ground?
>>>> On 10/13/2014 2:27 AM, William Miller wrote:
>>>> Friends:
>>>>
>>>> I looked at the Solarmount web site and I don't think the product
>>>> complies-- the wire management leaves leads exposed.  It's a nice start,
>>> however.
>>>> I was asked by Homepower to do an article on wire management.  I was
>>>> flattered they'd ask, but I had to decline because there is so few
>>>> options off-the-shelf that I can recommend.
>>>>
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>> Lic 773985
>>>> millersolar.com
>>>> 805-438-5600
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>>>
>>> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>>
>>> Change listserver email address & settings:
>>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>>
>>> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>>>
>>> List rules & etiquette:
>>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>>
>>> Check out or update participant bios:
>>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> -- 
>> Christopher Warfel, President
>> ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
>> PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
>> 401-466-8978
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>>
>> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>
>> Change listserver email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>>
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>
>> Check out or update participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>

-- 
Christopher Warfel, President
ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
401-466-8978




More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list