[RE-wrenches] Concentrics at 250 volts plus

Corey Shalanski cshalanski at joule-energy.com
Tue Jul 15 15:43:07 PDT 2014


Related question: How should we treat circuits that are less than 250V?
Does the EMT need to be bonded at EITHER end?

Some of our local inspectors are requiring bonding around all
concentric/eccentric knockouts, regardless of circuit voltage.

--
Corey Shalanski
Joule Energy
New Orleans, LA
ᐧ


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, <re-wrenches-request at lists.re-wrenches.org
> wrote:

>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:11:44 -0700
> From: William Miller <william at millersolar.com>
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Concentrics at 250 volts plus
> Message-ID: <52645F97-F231-4149-A8FD-D2E44E315AC5 at millersolar.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii
>
> Friends:
>
> Please help us settle a crew debate before we come to blows:  for circuits
> 250 volts and higher, do we need to bond EMT at both ends?  Or, if there is
> bonded cabinet with a concentric on one end and a solid, bonded metal
> cabinet on the other, do we need a bonding bushing on the concentric end?
>
> I say a conduit needs to be bonded only on one end. My misguided employee
> says both ends. Both cabinets are independently bonded.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> William
> Miller Solar
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20140715/b32c7eb2/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list