[RE-wrenches] Solar Edge v. micro inverters
Dave Click
daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu
Sat Jun 15 17:06:22 PDT 2013
As a quick clarification- SolarEdge requires PV WIRE per 690.35. Regular
USE-2 doesn't work for these systems.
On 2013/6/15 7:25, SwingJunkie wrote:
> Marco,
> We installed our first Enphase system in December 2009, and our last
> in December 2011, when their high failure rate became a problem.
> (Currently 10%+ for us). We were only installing the Enphase units on
> sites with shading issues, as a means to mitigate conditions.
> After moving away from Enphase, we selected SolarEdge as the
> solution of choice for those sites. The installation labor is
> comparable to the Enphase solution, separate device under each module.
> One clear advantage is that there are no custom trunk cables required,
> just the standard USE-2 cable and connectors.
> Our field experience has been better than expected production, and
> 1.4% failure rate. In December we installed a SolarEdge system just
> down the street from a site where we had previously installed an SMA
> string inverter on an unshaded site. The SolarEdge system has some
> shading. Both arrays have roughly the same orientation and pitch. To
> date the SolarEdge system with shading continues to out produce the
> unshaded SMA system by 5-8% kWh/kWp.
>
> I agree with your intuition on fewer components making a better
> solution and "IF" there is a reliable solution that accomplishes this
> that would be preferred.
> I just priced out the Mage AC module (SolarBridge technology) side
> by side with the Mage - SolarEdge combination and the later is less
> expensive equipment wise but I think that advantage would be erased by
> labor savings on the install.
> All that said I'm still a fan of the old fashioned string inverter
> solution unless the site shading conditions and or array geometry
> require an alternate solution.
>
> Cheers
> Carl Adams
> SunRock Solar
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:15 PM, "Marco Mangelsdorf" <marco at pvthawaii.com
> <mailto:marco at pvthawaii.com>> wrote:
>
> I've been educating myself on the Solar Edge product v. using micro
> inverters. If you click on the link below, you can read the pitch
> that they make for using their product over micros.
>
> Any opinions out there on how convincing their strategy is? As well
> as any experience in the field with the product?
>
> Intuitively, it seems to me that if you can accomplish what you need
> to accomplish (DC power from the PV mod to usable AC power) with fewer
> parts (as in a micro inverter instead of a DC-DC converter and a
> separate inverter), then that approach makes more sense.
>
> http://www.solaredge.us/groups/us/technology/microinverters
>
> thanks,
>
> marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20130615/e4821138/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list