[RE-wrenches] Tri-Star MPPT
jay peltz
jay at asis.com
Tue Jul 23 19:32:57 PDT 2013
Hi Eric,
While agree with most all your assessments,
Can you please elaborate on the "sulfation causes the voltage not to climb?"
This is quite counter to what I have seen and what the battery people say?
Thanks
Jay
Peltz power
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Eric.Bentsen at schneider-electric.com wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> If the SG was 1.26, of course the battery voltage would increase
> quickly to >30V (which is high for warm weather, BTW).
> It has been my experience that sulfation causes the voltage NOT to climb. Especially when you have a very large bank, and a
> relatively small amount of solar.
> Sometimes it is necessary to reduce the bank size into smaller sets to equalize them and recover their performance.
> This method of reducing bank size is also effective to compare performance and weed out a potentially bad battery.
> Systems that have a lot of capacity, with a relatively small amount of charge current usually creates problems, because
> the load demand exceeds solar production.
> This results in batteries that operate with partial SOC, which is when sulfation is most prevalent. With (8) L16s, you have approx
> 800Ahrs of capacity (24V bank). It would take significantly more than 8A of charge current to properly care for a bank that size.
>
> Rgds,
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Eric Bentsen | Schneider Electric | Solar Business | UNITED STATES | Technical Support Representative
> Phone: +(650) 351-8237 ext. 001# |
> Email: eric.bentsen at schneider-electric.com | Site: www.schneider-electric.com/solar | Address: 250 South Vasco Rd., Livermore, CA 94551
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20130723/2b045d39/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list