[RE-wrenches] Enphase and Romex

[Jason Szumlanski]

Good point. As I'm sure you've experienced, new means NO usually until the
case is made.

This all came to a head as we ran into a fairly inaccessible attic location
where feeding conduit is out of the question. I'll go for it and hope for
the best!

*Jason Szumlanski*

*Fafco Solar*

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:51 AM, William Miller <william at millersolar.com>wrote:

>  Jason:
>
> If bare copper can be subject to damage in the attic, the same would be
> true of NMC.  Is your inspector willing to shut down every residential
> wiring project in his/her jurisdiction?  I don't think so...
>
> William
>
>
> At 07:41 AM 10/25/2012, you wrote:
>
> William,
>
>
> Regarding the bare CU in the attic, some local inspectors have a real
> issue with what is "subject to physical damage." I'd like some code
> citations to be ready if anyone has it handy.
>
> *Jason Szumlanski*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20121025/cf8ff9ea/attachment-0004.html>