[RE-wrenches] Corrective EQ question

[Dana]

We regularly see SGs of 1.300 after EQ on very warm banks & banks that are
under used in summer periods. It has seemed to lower with the temp of the
bank dropping.

 

 

Dana Orzel - Great Solar Works, Inc -  E - dana at solarwork.com -  V
970.626.5253

F - 970.626.4140     C - 970.209.4076     web - www.solarwork.com  

"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"

Please consider the environment before printing this email   NABCEP #
051112-136

 

From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Allan
Sindelar
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 2:29 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Corrective EQ question

 

Wrenches,
A long-time off grid client has a 48V Outback VFX system, with 1,680 watts
of PV and two strings (16 batteries total) of Deka L16s, installed last
October. The array is undersized, as the system is running three households;
one efficient home and two single-person tiny homes, but still too much for
the system. We learned a few weeks ago that the system had apparently stayed
at 30-50% SOC for the entire winter (this is approximate, as her TriMetric
monitors would eventually drift away from % accuracy if never allowed to get
full and reset). Eventually the batteries became sufficiently sulfated that
the system began shutting down.

As the batteries were nearly new, we figured that the sulfation had not yet
become permanently crystallized, and they could recover. We initiated a long
"corrective equalization" from her combined generator (45A DC from the
single inverter) and MX60 controller, for a maximum C/12.5 charge rate; less
in proportion to any loads that were on while charging. She ran this
procedure for three hours/day for five days, and when that offered only
partial recovery (as measured by specific gravity measured with a
refractometer), ran for six hours/day for five days. During this time the
MX60 was also manually set to EQ each morning, with a 62V EQ voltage and 3
hour EQ time, so that the array would add its amperage to the gennie until
the batteries had been above this setting for three hours.

We went out there yesterday, arriving while the EQ was in process. All of
the cells had recovered, as measured by SG. SG readings were all in the
1.280 - 1.300 range, with most above 1.290. We had never seen SG readings
this high before. Given the situation and the back story, should we have any
concern about the high SG readings?

Thank you,
Allan

-- 
Allan Sindelar
 <mailto:Allan at positiveenergysolar.com> Allan at positiveenergysolar.com
NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic Installer
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder and Chief Technology Officer
Positive Energy, Inc.
3209 Richards Lane (note new address)
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
505 424-1112
www.positiveenergysolar.com <http://www.positiveenergysolar.com/>  

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120602/8a457a74/attachment-0004.html>