[RE-wrenches] embedded energy in pv

Tom Elliot tom at wagonmaker.com
Thu Mar 15 17:01:06 PDT 2012


Years ago I had my 15 minutes of fame on the old TechTV network’s show The Screensavers talking about PV and solar energy and got that question at the end of the show.  I had just looked up that info and remember that while it varies with manufacturer the numbers for embedded energy recovery for a typical PV panel were in the 2-4 year range.  That was in 2002 so with the advent of larger panels it may even be less now then it was then.  I don’t have a link but I’m sure Home Power has done any number of articles on this over the years.

It’s one of those myths anti-renewable energy folks like to throw out there.

From: benn kilburn 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:37 AM
To: Wrenches 
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] embedded energy in pv

I was told a few days ago that a PV module will likely never produce the energy it took to make it.... I bit my lip, disagreed and wished i could recall in detail what i had read in one of the reports/articles i had read in the past on this topic.  From what i can remember it is about 2-3 yrs. 

Can someone please provide any resources you may know of on this issue?

Jim, i would love to see the power point you mention.  I don't see an attachment.

Todd, could you please share where you read that info on the "1 to 4 tons of coal..."   I fully agree with you about educating customers on energy efficiency before talking system size.  ...and regarding your 'potential' customer, a couple categories come to mind for ones like that.... 'you can't argue with stupid', 'ignorance is bliss' (for that person).  For that matter, i guess you could include those solar 'experts' in those categories as well!

And regarding plastic framed modules, what about hemp or corn based plastic? (further reducing dependance on oil)  They are available and used for all kinds of things these days, why just check out the video on you tube of Ford's recent hemp plastic car!  ;)  
Add that to the corrosion resistance factor and perhaps that is enough for a niche market to catch on.  I agree with William.

Anyway, i hope to see some articles on embedded energy in pv modules.  

Cheers,
benn

DayStar Renewable Energy Inc. 
benn at daystarsolar.ca
780-906-7807 
HAVE A SUNNY DAY 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:42:45 -0700
From: toddcory at finestplanet.com
To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] embedded energy in pv


i recently read that it takes the equivalent energy of between 1 and 4 tons of coal to make a single pv module. this is why i insist my customers do their efficiency upgrades and learn how to be frugal/conserve before i will even talk about pv with them.



renewables powering waste is old paradigm thinking.

consuming less is always a win win.



unfortunately (now that there is an incentive program) the new "solar experts" coming on the scene here make more $$ with bigger systems, so lipstick on pigs is becoming the norm.



one customer wanted pv because her electric bill was over $600.00/month or 180 kWh/day!! i said there was something wrong with a power bill that high. maybe a duct on her heat pump had come loose and was blowing hot air into the attic and that should be investigated first with an energy audit. she hired another "expert" who put in a massive system. 



personally, i find it difficult to support this kind of resource use.



todd











On Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:26am, "Solarguy" <ntrei at 1scom.net> said:



William

Attached is a Power Point slide I made that shows the 'energy payback' from PV. The Swiss based IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme takes a very serious look at the PV industry and its long term effects on the planet and PV is already pretty benign. While I don't know the logic behind their calculations my first thought is that with the volume of aluminum being extracted and produced for all industry world-wide, the impact by the PV industry is probably next to nothing. 

And using a plastic compound would mean using a crude oil based product which is even a bigger environmental blight than aluminum production-imo. 

Besides, with the PV industries rush to lower prices someone would have discovered a cheaper non-metallic replacement for aluminum if it is out there. Having worked for many years in the composite/plastics industry I can say that the production of a substitute fiber re-enforced compression molded composite for PV frames would be more costly than aluminum and most likely still never match the rigidity of aluminum. 

Now if the PV industry trended back to smaller modules a 'plastic' frame could become workable but I don't see that moving out of R&D as long as prices and margins are so low. And I don't see a corrosion resistant module becoming a niche market any time soon unless another "Silicon Energy" type entrepreneur decides there is a market. 


Jim Duncan

****



-----Original Message-----
From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of William Miller
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:13 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Cc: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Installations in High Salt Spray Environments

Marco:

Are we in need of a new generation of PV modules with plastic frames?  How about frame-less modules on recycled plastic racking?  What is the energy cost for aluminum frame modules versus plastic or recycled plastic?  What is the energy cost of anodizing aluminum frames and racking?

There is a need here folks, that is not being filled.  Entrepreneurs, where are you?

William Miller







At 06:51 PM 3/14/2012, Marco Mangelsdorf wrote:

>Living here in the middle of the big Blue Pacific Ocean where one is 

>never all that far from the ocean, I really question how well any metal 

>is going to hold up over time, no matter what the warranty says.

>

>Even stainless rusts in these here parts.

>

>Installer beware and for sure don’t put yourselves at risk by 

>providing anything more than the modco’s factory warranty.

>

>marco

>

_______________________________________________

List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:

http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:

www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:

www.members.re-wrenches.org <<...>> 




Sent from Finest Planet WebMail.

_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4872 - Release Date: 03/15/12
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120315/9b36a782/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list