[RE-wrenches] Solar World 2.0 frames
Jason Szumlanski
jason at fafcosolar.com
Mon May 7 06:24:41 PDT 2012
The 2.0 frames are very sturdy, but they are a bit hard to hold/carry with
the rounded edge. We put 164 of them on the Naples Botanical Garden and it
worked out great.
Jason Szumlanski
Fafco Solar
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Dave Palumbo
<dave at independentpowerllc.com>wrote:
> All,****
>
> ** **
>
> We are considering using Solar World 2.0 framed modules. Not having put
> hands on these yet, we are looking for testimonials and opinions on these
> “top mount only” modules. ****
>
> And while we’re at, it what about Solar World’s 2.5’s with the bottom
> mount flange?****
>
> ** **
>
> David Palumbo****
>
> Independent Power LLC ****
>
> 462 Solar Way Drive****
>
> Hyde Park, VT 05655**
>
> *www.independentpowerllc.com *
>
> NABCEP Certified PV Installer****
>
> Vermont Solar Partner****
>
> 24 Years Experience, (802) 888-7194 ****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120507/ea925c9d/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list