[RE-wrenches] AL vs CU
Exeltech
exeltech at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 13 10:39:20 PST 2012
AL advantage:
Weight (especially in long overhead runs).
Theft factor (less attractive than CU to thieves at the moment).
CU advantage:
Smaller conductors for a given current.
CU-friendly lugs are readily found on the shelf.
Ease of attachment to hardware.
Less brittle/more flexible than AL.
Commonly available in a variety of gauges.
Common to both:
Both metals corrode if improperly protected.
AL/CU recognized splice blocks alleviate dissimilar metals issues.
Likely there are many more. There's a wealth of experience in this group.
Dan
--- On Mon, 2/13/12, James Rudolph <jamesrudolph99 at gmail.com> wrote:
From: James Rudolph <jamesrudolph99 at gmail.com>
Subject: [RE-wrenches] AL vs CU
To: "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
Date: Monday, February 13, 2012, 10:35 AM
Gurus,
Other than the cost and increased labor what else could be a factor in determining
whether or not to use copper or aluminum in long output circuits?
--
James B Rudolph
NABCEP Certified PV Installer
California Certified Journeyman Electrician
Don't get me wrong: I love nuclear energy! It's just that I prefer
fusion to fission.
And it just so happens that there's an enormous
fusion reactor safely banked a
few million miles from us. It delivers
more than we could ever use in just about 8
minutes. And it's wireless! - William McDonough
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120213/6500d10c/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list