[RE-wrenches] Feeder without a dedicated breaker
William Miller
william at millersolar.com
Tue Oct 25 20:47:25 PDT 2011
Colleagues:
Thanks everyone for the feedback. This is someone else's installation but
I want to know what to say if the inspector questions this part of the system.
William Miller
At 07:20 PM 10/25/2011, you wrote:
>Romex sheath is not generally considered much protection. The intent of
>the code is that the tap wires that are not adequately protected by the
>feeder over current protective device have hardened physical
>protection. My read is that they need to be in conduit or some
>substantial enclosure.
>
>
>>Also at issue is the question: is the romex wire protected "by other
>>means"? Judgement call.
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list