[RE-wrenches] 690.4 (B) ???

[William Miller]

Dan:

Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that Kirk draw anything. I suggest he 
refer to the drawing identified as Figure 690.1(B) in the 2008 NEC.

If the inspector will still not accept the facts, there is usually an 
appeal process.

I'm all for being polite, but I am also in favor of not letting an ignorant 
inspector take advantage of me or my clients.

William



At 05:50 AM 4/10/2011, you wrote:

>William's suggestion for a clearly drawn one-line
>is also excellent.
>
>In the end, however, as we all know, it's the AHJ's
>interpretation that prevails (right or wrong).
>
>
>Dan
>
>
>--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Kirk Herander, VSE <kirk at vtsolar.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Kirk Herander, VSE <kirk at vtsolar.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.4 (B) ???
> > To: conradg at cape.com, "'RE-wrenches'"
> > <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> > Date: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 7:26 AM
> > My situation does not concern AC and DC in the same
> > raceway. It concerns an AC conductor from the utility
> > main panel to a load subpanel, and a separate AC
> > inverter output from an inverter combiner panel, back
> > to the main panel, not being allowed in the same
> > conduit - at least that's the interpretation
> > of 690.4(B) of the 2008 NEC by my inspector.
> >
> > Kirk Herander
> > Vermont Solar Engineering
> > 802.863.1202
> > NABCEP(tm) Certified Solar Installer
> > NYSERDA-eligible Installer
> > VT Solar Incentive Program Partner
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________

William Miller
Miller Solar
Voice :805-438-5600
email: william at millersolar.com
http://millersolar.com
License No. C-10-773985
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20110410/bf26c9c5/attachment-0004.html>