<html>
<body>
<font size=3>Dan:<br><br>
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that Kirk draw anything. I suggest
he refer to the drawing identified as Figure 690.1(B) in the 2008
NEC.<br><br>
If the inspector will still not accept the facts, there is usually an
appeal process.<br><br>
I'm all for being polite, but I am also in favor of not letting an
ignorant inspector take advantage of me or my clients.<br><br>
William<br><br>
<br><br>
At 05:50 AM 4/10/2011, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>William's suggestion for a clearly
drawn one-line<br>
is also excellent.<br><br>
In the end, however, as we all know, it's the AHJ's<br>
interpretation that prevails (right or wrong).<br><br>
<br>
Dan<br><br>
<br>
--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Kirk Herander, VSE <kirk@vtsolar.com>
wrote:<br><br>
> From: Kirk Herander, VSE <kirk@vtsolar.com><br>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.4 (B) ???<br>
> To: conradg@cape.com, "'RE-wrenches'"<br>
> <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org><br>
> Date: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 7:26 AM<br>
> My situation does not concern AC and DC in the same<br>
> raceway. It concerns an AC conductor from the utility<br>
> main panel to a load subpanel, and a separate AC<br>
> inverter output from an inverter combiner panel, back<br>
> to the main panel, not being allowed in the same<br>
> conduit - at least that's the interpretation<br>
> of 690.4(B) of the 2008 NEC by my inspector.<br>
> <br>
> Kirk Herander<br>
> Vermont Solar Engineering<br>
> 802.863.1202<br>
> NABCEP(tm) Certified Solar Installer<br>
> NYSERDA-eligible Installer<br>
> VT Solar Incentive Program Partner<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
William Miller <br>
Miller Solar<br>
Voice :805-438-5600<br>
email: william@millersolar.com<br>
<a href="http://millersolar.com/" eudora="autourl">http://millersolar.com<br>
</a>License No. C-10-773985<br>
</font></body>
</html>