[RE-wrenches] Reference PV System
jason pozner
zzyyzzx11 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 3 20:52:32 PST 2011
Rob,
I think much of your snow removal will be at your lesser test angles. 4:12
might be a problem, but here in Western Colorado we are seeing 10:12 pitch
(40 deg) shed quite easily after a storm (would be curious about the 6:12(we
don't see too much here)). I think, although we don't share similar
latitudes, we do share similar snowpack. Colorado, and I believe Edmonton
have a Continental snowpack which tend to have lower moisture content
(colder dryer snow). Usually we don't see the rhyming issues that a Costal
or even Intermountain experience, so the "tackiness" of the snow is less of
a problem. Usually with the first sun after a storm, we see a pretty good
shed of the array. I agree with Todd in that raising the array will give
the snow a place to accumulate. I am curious about an automated snow
removal. Whats that like, can it be done without heat? Thinking about the
steep pitched array, I always wonder if just a bit of heat to melt and
lubricate the glass sliding surface would be enough of a boost to clear snow
earlier. I have had the conversation a few times with an off grid client,
and convinced him it wasn't the best use of his energy harvest, but for
science....
Jay Pozner
Nunatak AES
Crested Butte, CO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20110103/8ae1cff1/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list