[RE-wrenches] sources of DC equipment
Dan Fink
danbob at hughes.net
Sun Apr 11 10:23:18 PDT 2010
Ray;
I concur on the Thin-lites for DC FL. Bomb-proof.
I've had better luck than you on the Shur-Flo pumps it seems -- 3-5
years each in full time service, then needing a diaphragm rebuild kit
(cheap). I think I have about 8 of these installed for customers (and
myself) right now. I always use a pressure tank for domestic, but my
spring pumping systems don't have that. Most customers just keep an
extra pump on hand to minimize downtime if there is a problem. I lost
one DC Shurflo 2088 to lightning, improved the grounding and it hasn't
happened since.
DC systems are a hassle for both the installer and customer. Price out a
12-pack of 120 VAC CFLs at Home Depot vs. the same 12-pack of DC
CFLS....the difference would buy lots of 12-packs of beer! I have DC
circuits in every room of my house, in addition to AC....but as time has
gone by (since 1991) more and more of them on the DC side sit idle
anymore. Same with my customers.
DAN FINK
Buckville Energy Consulting LLC
R Ray Walters wrote:
> We've had the same experience with DC CFLs, about 50% return rate. They just can't handle voltages below 12 v, so we quit carrying them.
> After years of working on DC wiring, just go to AC. You could wire all the lights on one circuit in 12 AWG. (instead of running 10 AWG or bigger, and then trying to pigtail down to 12, for the switch, and then trying to find DC rated switches.......ugh)
> It's just plain faster, cheaper, and more reliable to use an inverter these days. I would only use DC lighting with LEDs, and only for very limited (1 to 2 light) systems.
> If you do have to do DC fluorescents, at least use the Thin light long tube fixtures, they'll last a lot longer.
> The only advantage to going DC I can see, is on RVs, because you can tie into the vehicle electrical system.
> Every small cabin remote cabin system I've worked on, eventually grew and got an inverter. If the wiring is already there, you'll be happier.
> For pumps, I've had the FLowlights consistently last over 10 years in full time service. THe Shurflos have there place, but only last about 1 to 2 years in full-time service.
> For part time use cabin, the Shurflo would probably last longer, especially if you add an external pressure switch and pressure tank (and then the system would be ready for the upgrade to the FLowlight, after the SHurflo burns out)
>
>
> R. Walters
> ray at solarray.com
> Solar Engineer
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list