[RE-wrenches] ballasted roof rack - on the ground?

Geoff Greenfield geoff at third-sun.com
Sun Aug 23 08:43:31 PDT 2009


Thanks all.., good intel- I will be checking with the various Manus to see what they say. I suspect "flatness" is a big question. 

For a brighter energy future,

Geoff Greenfield
President
Third Sun Solar & Wind Power Ltd.
340 West State Street, Unit 25
Athens, OH 45701

740.597.3111     Fax 740.597.1548
www.Third-Sun.com

Clean Energy - Expertly Installed






----- Dave Click <daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu> wrote:
> I think that the 250kW Florida Power & Light array in Sarasota, FL was 
> installed on a ground cover (over a landfill) like the SIT solution, and 
> that it was just done with PowerGuard.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] ballasted roof rack - on the ground?
> From: Joel  Davidson <joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net>
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Date: 2009/8/21 10:14
> 
> > Geoff,
> >  
> > Solar Integrated Technologies adheres its panels on ground covers 
> > over landfills to capture landfill gases and separately produce PV 
> > electricity. Perhaps a wrench with Powerlight experience can tell us why 
> > rigid modules are not laid on a ground cover.
> >  
> > Joel Davidson
> > 
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     *From:* Geoff Greenfield <mailto:geoff at third-sun.com>
> >     *To:* RE-wrenches <mailto:re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:35 PM
> >     *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] ballasted roof rack - on the ground?
> > 
> >     esteemed wrenches (or just steamed if youve been out in the hot lately)
> > 
> >     I'm curious why more folks don't use the same flat roof ballasted
> >     rack approach for large ground mounts?  Geotech weed barier and off
> >     we go...  my initial calcs sat its a cost saver... my instinct says
> >     it viable, but my other instinct says "if it were this easy I would
> >     see it all the time (and I've never seen it)
> > 
> >     what's up?  frost heave/instability?  wav-i-ness of the ground?
> >     better performance at steep angle worth all the extra cost (not
> >     according to my pencil with today's mod costs).  Thoughts? 
> > 
> >     For a brighter energy future,
> > 
> >     Geoff Greenfield
> >     President
> >     Third Sun Solar & Wind Power Ltd.
> >     340 West State Street, Unit 25
> >     Athens, OH 45701
> > 
> >     740.597.3111     Fax 740.597.1548
> >     www.Third-Sun.com
> > 
> >     Clean Energy - Expertly Installed
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     ----- "Dave Click" <daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu> wrote:
> >      > Thanks all.
> >      >
> >      > It was my understanding that we should still be running the
> >     conductors
> >      > of the same circuit through the same raceway, even if it is the
> >     DC input
> >      > into the inverter since that DC oscillates slightly (nowhere near as
> >      > much as AC). I wasn't concerned about eddy currents in the FNMC of
> >      > course but the metal box itself, a concern being voiced on this list
> >      > before. I'd be more concerned about this if it were a 1MW inverter
> >      > rather than a 7kW, but still.
> >      >
> >      > Thanks for the info on the GEC tap and I'm glad the split bolts
> >     work here.
> >      >
> >      > The conduit in question doesn't seem to be there just for physical
> >      > protection; the wire runs from the east end of the array for
> >     100'+ and
> >      > only the last 3' are in conduit. If it were only for protection
> >     I'd be
> >      > fine with it being open-ended on both ends, but since it's there
> >     to feed
> >      > the conductors into the box, that's why I was treating it as a
> >     regular
> >      > conduit that required a cord grip at the other end. Where do
> >     others make
> >      > the distinction?
> >      >
> >      > Thanks,
> >      > DKC
> >      >
> >      > -------- Original Message --------
> >      > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] DC positive and negative in same conduit,
> >      > other inspection issues
> >      > From: Kelly Keilwitz, Whidbey Sun &  Wind <kelly at whidbeysunwind.com>
> >      > To: RE Wrenches listserve <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> >      > Date: 2009/8/19 21:10
> >      >
> >      > > Dave,
> >      > > Only GEC's are subject to the "continuous" rule (250.64C). It
> >     sounds like
> >      > > your are talking about an EGC tapped from the GEC.
> >      > >
> >      > > When splicing PV GEC's required under 690.47D, either together
> >     (from
> >      > > separated arrays) or to the existing AC GEC (if close enough),
> >     we have been
> >      > > allowed to use split bolts instead of irreversible splices, per
> >     250.64D1,
> >      > > "Grounding Electrode Conductor Taps" (at end of paragraph).
> >     I.E., the
> >      > > "continuous" rule is only being applied to the main GEC.
> >      > >
> >      > > I agree with Kurt on the LTNMF being used only as extra (not
> >     required) wire
> >      > > protection for the USE-2. We often do this when running PV
> >     conductors
> >      > > between short separations in modules or rails. I would think
> >     that only
> >      > > temperature and fill corrections would apply - and only if the
> >     length
> >      > > requires.
> >      > >
> >      > > -Kelly
> >      > >
> >      > > Kelly Keilwitz, P.E.
> >      > > Whidbey Sun & Wind, LLC
> >      > > Renewable Energy Systems
> >      > > NABCEP Certified PV Installer
> >      > > 987 Wanamaker Rd,
> >      > > Coupeville, WA 98239
> >      > > PH & FAX 360-678-7131
> >      > > sunwind at whidbeysunwind.com
> >      > >
> >      > > On 8/19/09 2:41 PM, "Dave Click" <daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu> wrote:
> >      > >
> >      > >> For the grounding electrode wiring, it seems that it's fine to
> >     me since
> >      > >> they ran the continuous #6 to each rail and then to the rod,
> >     qualifying
> >      > >> as the 690.47(D) supplemental electrode. But the split bolts
> >     tapping
> >      > >> that GEC to "ground the disconnect," these are required to be
> >      > >> irreversible connections to the ground bus in that disconnect,
> >     right?
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >  
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > > _______________________________________________
> >      > > List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> >      > >
> >      > > List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> >      > >
> >      > > Options & settings:
> >      > >
> >     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> >      > >
> >      > > List-Archive:
> >     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> >      > >
> >      > > List rules & etiquette:
> >      > > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> >      > >
> >      > > Check out participant bios:
> >      > > www.members.re-wrenches.org
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > _______________________________________________
> >      > List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> >      >
> >      > List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> >      >
> >      > Options & settings:
> >      > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> >      >
> >      > List-Archive:
> >     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> >      >
> >      > List rules & etiquette:
> >      > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> >      >
> >      > Check out participant bios:
> >      > www.members.re-wrenches.org
> >      >
> >      >
> > 
> >     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> > 
> >     List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> > 
> >     Options & settings:
> >     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> > 
> >     List-Archive:
> >     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> > 
> >     List rules & etiquette:
> >     www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> > 
> >     Check out participant bios:
> >     www.members.re-wrenches.org
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> > 
> > List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> > 
> > Options & settings:
> > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> > 
> > List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> > 
> > List rules & etiquette:
> > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> > 
> > Check out participant bios:
> > www.members.re-wrenches.org
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 




More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list