[RE-wrenches] NABCEP

[William Miller]

Tump:

I think we are in agreement here.  There needs to be some method to enable 
qualified installers and disable unqualified.

I don't think the issue is whether I support NABCEP's goals or not.  The 
issue is that regulators do not require some type of verification that a 
given installer can perform a safe installation.  If NABCEP certification 
were required, I would have it and those just dabbling in the trade would 
not.  This would be an improvement over the current situation.

Until this requirement becomes reality, acquiring NAPCEP certification has 
no benefit for me.

William Miller

At 07:03 AM 11/26/2009, you wrote:
>Having worked for many years educating my clients, legislators and other 
>officials of the value of a NABCEP certification,NABCEP IS important to 
>me. I have invested many hours working w/ the early supporters, 
>developing  a national certification program which morphed into the NABCEP 
>program. I also work on various NABCEP committees working to insure 
>NABCEP,the test & the test questions are relevant AND continue to address 
>the real world of PV installations I personally find your lack of support 
>for the NABCEP certification undermining.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20091130/630b88f8/attachment-0003.html>