[RE-wrenches] Installer's grant

[Bill Brooks]

Roger, 

 

Why would a legitimate contractor argue against this reduced incentive (it
is not a penalty at all)? This is simply acknowledging the fact that
operating a business and providing a long-term system warranty costs money
that a self-installer does not have to carry. This actually came from a
strong recommendation I made to the California Energy Commission since early
in the rebate program over 30% of installations were "self-installed" which
was a bunch of BS. These were black market contractors who did not want to
carry a system warranty or did not have the credentials to install the
system.

 

Once we installed the slightly lower rebate cleaned up most of the black
market contracting and the number of self-installed systems went to the real
number of less than 5%.

 

Arguing against the lower rebate was a mistake that you are going to regret.
It's helpful to learn from history before repeating it.

 

Bill.

 

 

From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of roger dixon
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:33 PM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Installer's grant

 

Try the DSIRE website, http://www.dsireusa.org/.  It lists both state and
federal incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency.  

 

Up until this year, NJ would penalize a "self install", reducing the rebate
amount by 15%.  We argued against that and they have now removed that
penalty.

 

Roger Dixon

Certified Wind Site Assessor

Distributor & Installer of Solar & Wind Energy Systems 

Skylands Renewable Energy, LLC

908.337.2057 cell

908.730.6474 fax

roger.dixon at skylandsre.com

www.skylandsre.com

SkylandsRenewD66bR03dP01ZL

 

Note: The information contained in this communication is confidential, may
be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is
intended only for the use of the addressee(s).  It is the property of the
sender of this e-mail.  If you receive this e-mail in error, do not review,
disseminate, or copy it.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy this communication and
all copies thereof, including all attachments.

 

From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Drake
Chamberlin
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:50 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Installer's grant

 

Hello Wrenches,

I wanted to see how other states are handling solar grants / rebates on the
homes of installers.  In Ohio there is a grant program that gives $3.00 /
Watt toward residential systems.  Eligible installers must be approved by
the state, and funds are allotted to the installer.  

In this years program, there is a "conflict of interest" clause which says
that installers, employees of installers and subcontractors of installers
are not eligible for any grant funding from the grant received by the
installer.   It is likely that installers can hire their competition to do
installations.

Do other states have this conflict of interest clause?

Thanks, 

Drake Chamberlin
Athens Electric
OH License 44810
CO License 3773
NABCEP TM  Certified PV Installer 
Office - 740-448-7328
Mobile - 740-856-9648 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20090831/1b661e3a/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20090831/1b661e3a/attachment-0003.jpg>