So much for market demand [RE-wrenches]
Joel Davidson
joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jan 15 22:30:34 PST 2008
<x-flowed>
Believe it or not, quick-connects are another reason why we need subsidies
to grow the US PV market. Multi-Contact did an excellent job marketing its
quick-connects and a few US system integrators switched to MC connectors,
but the big change happened when the German government heavily subsidized PV
and it became the biggest market. PV manufacturers cater to German, and now
other European, customers whose wiring requirements are very different from
UL and US inspector requirements. In Germany you can interconnect modules up
to 1000 volts with quick-connects and double-insulated wire. In the US, the
Bush-Cheney administration rejected PV so US PV customers lost their voice
in the market. Last year, Germans bought about 10 times more PV modules than
the US. It is going to take an big change in government and a few years
before the US has a powerful voice in the PV market. Do any Chinese
manufacturers make UL listed modules with j-boxes?
Joel Davidson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Walters"
To: <RE-wrenches at topica.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: So much for market demand [RE-wrenches]
>
>
> I'm with you too, just we are not the market forces we think we are.
> Other countries are setting the pace on these issues, and we're lucky
> they even let us have any modules at all. I'm just trying my best to
> stick with one module model and not have to switch every 6 months. Buying
> modules is like the black market, you make a deal, and the next day they
> tell you they're out of stock. I hate it, so much so I'm considering
> getting out of the sales side all together and just do consulting or
> teaching.
> The loose wiring not only has the safety issues you've brought up, but it
> just looks plain unprofessional. I look at my older work with jboxes and
> its just plain better.
>
> On Jan 15, 2008, at 12:43 PM, William Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> Jeff:
>>
>> I have been wondering for some time: "Where is the indignation?" It is
>> refreshing to hear some. Anyone else?
>>
>> I was beginning to feel like Don Quixote. I do believe some of our
>> industry gurus such as those behind code review share some of your and
>> my concern here and that is why we are seeing the new language. I just
>> think we need to keep the pressure up on all fronts (code, market,
>> industry discussion groups, etc) and in the meantime, make what we have
>> as safe as we can.
>>
>> As for making exposed wiring safe, we aim to cover it as much as we can.
>> Here is our company policy:
>>
>> 1. Ground mounts: Commercial ground mounts need to be in a fenced area.
>> Residential ground mounts will receive our Volt Guard wire covers which
>> will cover wire and connectors. There is a link to a photo of our first
>> prototype (you may have seen this link recently). The next generation
>> will be a little bit wider:
>> http://mpandc.com/practices/Procedures/PV_wiring/PV_wiring.html
>>
>> 2. Roof mount PV: Commercial installations: We will require the
>> customers maintain restricted access. For residential installations, we
>> are developing a connector box with panel mount connectors. This box
>> will be installed near enough to the modules to allow the factory module
>> leads to reach. We will not be installing multiple splices in our PV
>> leads. We will use the Wiley clips and stainless steel cable ties to
>> ensure cable are kept up under the modules completely and permanently.
>>
>> And a last thought: Reliability suffers with the new quick connect
>> trend. When we had J-boxes, all of our PV leads were without one
>> splice. Ever. With quick connects, there is a splice between each
>> module. There is a splice on the negative lead where it meets the field
>> supplied USE lead. There is a splice where the field supplied USE cable
>> meets the building wire in a J-box. Same two spices are in the positive
>> lead. This proliferation of splices lead to failures. These spices are
>> often times hidden under modules. It generally takes two persons to
>> pull modules hunting for a bad splice. I feel splices should be readily
>> accessible to technicians but not to children. We have that part
>> backwards.
>>
>> Thanks for your commitment to safety.
>>
>> William Miller
>>
>>
>>
>> At 10:35 AM 1/15/2008, you wrote:
>>
>>> We have been begging for modules with J-boxes to use on ground- mounted
>>> arrays to reduce shock risk to clients kids and the public, but module
>>> manufacturers refuse to make anything except pig-tails. I know many of
>>> you have been asking for the same thing ever since they were
>>> dis-continued, as each manufacturer started to used their own version
>>> of a quick-dis-connect. We have gone from using simple cut-to-length
>>> rolled-up conduit, to separate boxes of all kinds of special
>>> connectors, expensive crimpers, and custom-made cables that do not
>>> match from one module manufacturer to another.
>>>
>>> I always thought when there was a big market demand for a product, the
>>> market would respond with the product needed - so much for market
>>> forces in this industry where manufacturers make whatever they want and
>>> you have to take what you can get. I am guessing everyone is marketing
>>> now to Europe and their needs and we are left with "make-do" hardware
>>> trying to meet constantly changing codes that are far more demending
>>> than any other non-solar power systems.
>>>
>>> With modules now only available with wiring connectors that are
>>> dangerous where accessible, and with code officials demanding wiring
>>> procedures that we cannot meet with current products, and when only
>>> very costly "make-do" wiring arrangements must be used to provide some
>>> level of wiring access safety, I see a perfect storm on the horizon and
>>> its called the 2008 NEC codebook.
>>>
>>> Jeff Yago
>>
- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list