Outback X-240 Autotransformer [RE-wrenches]

[Kurt Albershardt]

<x-flowed>

--On Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:27 PM -0700 Drake Chamberlin <Drake.Chamberlin at redwoodalliance.org> wrote:
>
> I haven't been able to find efficiency specifications for the X-240 in the Outback literature.  Maybe I'm missing it.  I thought I remembered a list posting saying that it was 80% efficient.  Is that a correct figure?

I certainly hope not.  Autotransformers are more efficient than two winding transformers (due to their lower relucatance) and good 2-winding transformers are typically over 95% efficient.  98-99% is not out of the question.








.


- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine

To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1213 - Release Date: 1/7/2008 9:14 AM

</x-flowed>