2007 Energy Bill without solar incentives? [RE-wrenches]

[Don Loweburg]

In a message dated 11/10/2007 8:35:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net writes:

Just  because a law promotes "clean coal" (bullshit) and safe nukes (yeah, 
sure)  and the solar investment tax credit extension (hurray for our side) 
does  not mean you have to use or encourage the use of coal or nuclear 
generated  electricity. I say accept the bad with the good and continue to 
work for  change.





Hi Joel,
 
My comment "bingo" in response to Millers analysis was not so much an  
endorsement as just acknowledgment of his point. I can not say that I know  anything 
more-- other than it appears that Dem leadership is trying to tank the  bill.
 
 
I am not happy about the situation.
 
Don



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine

To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------