Battery Cycle Life Ratings [RE-wrenches]

[Matt Tritt]

<x-flowed>
 

Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on a Cruise for Free!
http://click.topica.com/caacOlEbz8Qcsbz9JC9a/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------

  My Trojan supplier was really pushing HCs when they first came on the 
scene a few years back. They sounded like the answer to the gap between 
portable batteries and big stationary types from all the wild claims that 
Trojan was making. - WRONG!

  I turns out that HCs actually have thinner plates than the standard L-16. 
What a hoot!
  They charged more for them, said they were superior to the standard duty 
and charged more. Go figure.

  Now when I go to this same distributor they talk about HCs like only 
morons would buy them in the first place. Last time I went in he asked if he 
could bid IBEs for my next job and asked my opinion on Surrette.These guys 
must have been shoe salesmen in a previous incarnation.

  Matt T
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Drake Chamberlin" <solar at ecoisp.com>
  To: <RE-wrenches at topica.com>
  Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:20 AM
  Subject: Re: Battery Cycle Life Ratings [RE-wrenches]




  Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
  -------------------------------------------------------------------
  Is America Safe? Give your opinion on Homeland Security and enter
  to win!
  http://click.topica.com/caacOlqbz8QcsbadqCja/PermissionData
  -------------------------------------------------------------------


  >-------------------------------------------------------------------
  >
  >  HC's are notorius for being short-lived. The standard L-16 is way 
better
  > for longevity and should be as least as good as a T-105. After all, it
  > has more lead.

  That is good to know about the HC.  One bank that died was definitely not
  HC.  In other systems, I've seen standard L - 16s not lasting anywhere 
near
  the 10 year rating.

  Didn't Sandia do a test of L-16s several years back that demonstrated that
  they did not really live up to their advertised potential?

  I've found the T-105 batteries to be incredibly tough.  I agree that they
  are too small for big systems.

  Drake

  Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
  -------------------------------------------------------------------
  Go on a Cruise for Free!
  http://click.topica.com/caacOlEbz8QcsbadqCjf/PermissionData
  -------------------------------------------------------------------

  - - - -
  To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

  Archive of previous messages: 
http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

  List rules & etiquette: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

  Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

  Hosted by Home Power magazine

  Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com

Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 4 Free low-fat, low-carb recipes
http://click.topica.com/caacOlybz8Qcsbz9JC9f/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

List rules & etiquette: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: re-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------







</x-flowed>