NABCEP test disclosure [RE-wrenches]

[Bob-O Schultze, Electron Connection]

<x-flowed>
Jeff,
Wow. I sincerely hope that "this kind of logic 
and legality" doesn't apply to NABCEP. It's a 
voluntary trade certification, not a publicly 
funded, open admissions policy, kind of thing. I 
doubt that disclosure is required. It isn't of 
IBEW testing, for example.
I agree with you in one aspect that errors and 
bias cannot stand. Toward that end, NABCEP has an 
independent testing firm review the test in a 
psychometric manner. (Whatever that means!) What 
it DOES is catch bad questions. In your round of 
testing, for example, it was discovered that two 
questions were missed by an overwhelming large 
percentage of the test takers. Further, those two 
questions were missed overwhelming by the persons 
scoring highest on the test overall. Obviously 
they were bad questions, one way or the other. So 
we threw them out. I don't even know which ones 
they were. As a test taker myself, I was not 
allow any access of any kind to the test , but I 
bet I missed them too!
In terms of making a NABCEP certification a real 
deal as far as the test is concerned, we're on 
it. Our test and procedures meet the ISO 
Whatever-it-is standard for certifications. I 
think I speak for the rest of the directors when 
I say that we really appreciate comments like 
this. They keep us engaged and the Wrenches 
informed.
I think Pogo said it best. "We have met the enemy 
and he is us." Welcome aboard.
Best, Bob-O

>Why does the College Board release the SAT tests after they are given? I
>believe it's the result of a long law suit, which indicated that since the
>SAT could have such a large influence on a person's future, they had a right
>to see the test at some point, to make sure there were not errors, bias, or
>other problems in the test.
>
>In fact, after this disclosure started, the SAT has been changed, because
>they have found errors and bias. (Real factual errors, which marked people
>wrong for answerers they got right. Also found that some answers actually
>had more than one truly correct answer.)
>
>It's my understanding that most educators believe the SAT to be a better
>test because of disclosure.
>
>Whether this kind of logic and legality applies to NABCEP probably has to do
>with NABCEP certification's standing in the professional world. If it
>becomes what most of us want, then the tests will need to have some process
>of disclosure. If it remains an obscure standard with little or no financial
>benefit, then it does not matter.
>
>It's my sincere hope that NABCEP does become a strong standard (as discussed
>in many other recent posts). It's also my strong desire that the tests have
>a method of disclosure as NABCEP moves forward. This is not sour grapes, I
>passed handily. It has everything to do with making NABCEP a clear,
>transparent, leading certification means.
>
>
>Jeffery D. Wolfe, P.E.
>NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer™

--
Bob-O Schultze, Electron Connection
PO Box 203, Hornbrook, CA 96044
800.945.7587 or 530.475.3402
fax 530-475-3401
www.electronconnection.com

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/

List rules & etiquette: http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------



</x-flowed>