becoming an inter-tie system [RE-wrenches]
Tom Elliot
telliot at wagonmaker.com
Mon Feb 19 22:22:28 PST 2001
The NEC does have a variance option that worked for me when I installed my
roof mounted system. I wrote a letter to the state electrical board
explaining the difficulties and excess costs of obtaining the appropriate
device and pointing out that they were not commonly available and I rather
easily got a very nice letter (also sent to the inspector) giving me a
variance.
Give it a shot. The code requirement is pretty absurd.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Miller" <wrmiller at slonet.org>
To: <RE-wrenches at topica.com>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: becoming an inter-tie system [RE-wrenches]
> Pals:
>
> Could the GFI be required to protect from fire hazard as well as, or
> instead of, electrocution? I try not to second guess Code requirements
> unless I have some pretty substantial knowledge base, and I believe
talking
> a client out of a required device could be a liability nightmare.
>
> William
- - - - - - -
To send a message:
RE-wrenches at topica.com
The archive of previous messages:
http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/
List rules & etiquette:
http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm
To unsubscribe send a message to:
RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
To check out the other RE-Wrench participants:
www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html
Hosted by Home Power magazine:
www.homepower.com
For info contact list moderator by email:
michael.welch at homepower.com
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list