Just in from Square D [RE-wrenches]
hugh piggott
hugh.piggott at enterprise.net
Sat Mar 10 11:53:33 PST 2001
<x-flowed>There are all sorts of faults which could develop.
At 10:12 am -0800 10/3/01, Drake Chamberlin - Electrical Energy wrote:
>
>The code requires overcurrent protection in ungrounded conductors.
As I understand it, this is because there could be a fault earth
circuit back to the other pole behind the breaker (and this would not
already have blown a fuse/tripped a breaker, because the system is
floating).
>
>The resistance varies with the length of the run. It doesn't take a
>very long run of #12 wire to limit the surge of low voltage current
>to well within the bounds of the 5000 DC amp interrupt capability of
>the QO breaker.
Hmm but who is to say where the fault is going to happen - which end
of the wire? Or right at the breaker?
>
>ARTICLE 720 -- Circuits and Equipment Operating at Less than 50 Volts
>
>720-4. Conductors
>Conductors shall not be smaller than No. 12 copper or equivalent.
that's a bit fascist. What about circuits with 1 amp fuses?
--
Hugh
Scoraig, Scotland
http://www.scoraigwind.co.uk
- - - - - - -
To send a message:
RE-wrenches at topica.com
The archive of previous messages:
http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/
List rules & etiquette:
http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm
To unsubscribe send a message to:
RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
To check out the other RE-Wrench participants:
www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html
Hosted by Home Power magazine:
www.homepower.com
For info contact list moderator by email:
michael.welch at homepower.com
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list