[RE-wrenches] Wago Connectors (221 series)
Ray
ray at solarray.com
Sat May 8 14:31:24 EDT 2021
This whole high voltage connection discussion got me searching, and I
found Phoenix Contact makes a DIN rail mount terminal block that is 1000
v rated. That would seem to make way more sense than using MC 4
connects in a J box, and would provide the access for voltage readings
and torque check that William mentioned. Has anybody tried them?
https://www.phoenixcontact.com/online/portal/us?1dmy&urile=wcm%3apath%3a/usen/web/main/products/subcategory_pages/Modular_terminal_blocks_for_photovoltaics_P-15-09/eb8c193d-6a2d-4349-8f89-2d523fd5b04f
Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
On 5/7/21 8:47 PM, William Miller wrote:
>
> Friends:
>
> Call me old fashioned, but I cannot get any confidence on the Wago
> connector. It seems somewhat akin to the back-wire mechanism on a 15A
> receptacle. This connection relies on a spring that is subject to
> reduction in force when it gets hot. We have seen many of the
> back-wire receptacles heat up and get more resistive as heat
> increases, creating more heat, etc.
>
> We have learned when connecting battery cables to inverters or
> batteries that the best connection does not have any washer or any
> intermediate object between one conductor and the other.
>
> I know wire nuts are not ideal (pun intended) but I like my conductors
> to be in direct contact, or under a screw terminal where I can
> determine and reconfirm the pressure placed on the conductor. It is
> also necessary to have control over the pressure applied to the
> connection, which is why there are listed torque specs.
>
> Yesterday I was measuring the line voltage on an SB Series 22
> inverter. This unit uses the Wago terminal. There was no way I could
> get a meter probe into the Wago to measure line voltage. I had to
> take the cover off the electronics sections and measure voltage at the
> circuit board. I much prefer a screw terminal I can adjust the torque
> and get a meter probe onto it.
>
> William Miller
>
> Miller Solar
>
> 17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422
>
> 805-438-5600
>
> www.millersolar.com <http://www.millersolar.com/>
>
> CA Lic. 773985
>
> *From:*RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
> <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dan
> Fink
> *Sent:* Friday, May 7, 2021 4:01 PM
> *To:* RE-wrenches
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Wago Connectors (221 series)
>
> Jason; From the Wago 221 data sheet, it's listed to UL 486C, 600V,
> 30A, Use Group C (industrial) . I have a copy of UL486C, and voltage
> is just specified for dielectric testing. That standard specifies
> tests with AC, because it is easier (and cheaper) to generate and ramp
> up compared to DC, and DC test platforms are relatively rare.
>
> So my interpretation of UL486C is that because of AC voltage peaks
> compared to RMS (Vpeak = Vrms x 1,414), a 1000VAC rated connector
> under UL486C would need to be tested to 1414VDC. Working that math
> backwards, a 600VAC rating would mean the DC dielectric rating would
> be equivalent to 424.33 VDC.
>
> How that would apply to AHJs asking you questions, I do not know!
>
> Dan Fink
>
> Owner, Buckville Energy Consulting LLC
>
> IREC Certified Instructor for PV and Small Wind Installation
>
> NABCEP Certified PV System Inspector
>
> d <mailto:dan.fink at greendustrialtraining.com>anbob88 at gmail.com
> <mailto:anbob88 at gmail.com>
>
> 970-672-4342
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:43 PM Jason Szumlanski
> <jason at floridasolardesigngroup.com
> <mailto:jason at floridasolardesigngroup.com>> wrote:
>
> In another thread these connectors were discussed recently. There
> was a question regarding the suitability for DC circuits. I don't
> think we came up with any answers or consensus on that. I see the
> connectors are UL listed to the 486C standard. I can't determine
> whether that is applicable to AC and DC circuits. Does anyone know?
>
> I have only used these on AC circuits and they have been very
> effective. Now I'm curious whether they can be used on DC circuits
> up to 600 volts.
>
> While on the subject, I noticed they are UL 467 listed for
> grounding and bonding. That's helpful where you have EGC splices
> for conductors up to #10 AWG inside junction boxes.
>
> Jason Szumlanski
>
> Florida Solar Design Group
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20210508/4e7570f7/attachment.htm>
More information about the RE-Wrenches
mailing list