[RE-wrenches] Looking for insulated #6 bare standoff

Dana dana at solarwork.com
Sat Apr 21 12:41:51 EDT 2018


Hey Ray,

I completely agree with you. I had an inspector in CO that was know in the early days of solar among the manufacturers as that SOB in CO.

I finally called his supervisor after several failed meetings where I felt fairly sure that I was interpreting on the side of safety and the code. His supervisor agreed with me & I got a call from the inspector asking why I called his boss & why couldn’t we have discussed this?

 

I replied that I had tried. We had a completely positive relationship after that call. It turns out his home life was hell, he had a drinking problem, and his teenage daughter was pregnant. He turned a corner after that and a few years later retired. He is a happier man today.

 

People can change, and it is one of the hardest things we all endure.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dana Orzel                              Great Solar Works, Inc. 

C - 208.721.7003                       dana at solarwork.com

Idaho Contractor - # 028765         Idaho PV # 028374

NABCEP # 051112-136                        <http://www.solarwork.biz> www.solarwork.biz

"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"  

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

 

From: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On Behalf Of Ray
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 1:01 PM
To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Looking for insulated #6 bare standoff

 

I've dealt with tough inspectors in many jurisdictions.  I seem to spend 50% of my time doing education.  I do not just take the AHJs word as gospel and blindly follow.  I meet with them, sit down with the code and we work it out.  I am not afraid to question or protest a decision.  After a few years, the inspectors know I'm not trying to get away with sub standard work, and that we all want the installation to be done right.

-Ray

 

On 4/20/18 12:38 PM, cwarfel wrote:

It's just not Idaho. I was just asked about NEC PV interpretation for a large city on the East coast. Same problem. Narrowly (and incorrectly) interpreting the grounding requirements. 

It's probably nervous inspectors who feel their neck is on the line, and are interpreting defensively thinking that is the safest thing for them to do. We have taught a lot of Code officials and they really feel exposed when it comes to PV. 

The key to me is just taking time, if the Building Official has it, to go over the NEC sections and their relevance. It has to be made understandable and easy. These people are suppose to approve everything from house wiring to appliances to pools, to anything that requires a permit. It is just too much for almost everyone to understand completely. Look at all the questions we have with 690 and 705 alone
Chris.



On 4/20/2018 1:28 PM, Dana wrote:

Reasonable inspector, here? You have no idea.

The plans examiner is the first link in the process here in Idaho, he is; by the book, crossing t’s & dotting I’s and has a very strict & narrow interpretation of the code. That said he is very helpful and a nice guy. It’s an Idaho thing. 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dana Orzel                              Great Solar Works, Inc. 

C - 208.721.7003                       dana at solarwork.com <mailto:dana at solarwork.com> 

Idaho Contractor - # 028765         Idaho PV # 028374

NABCEP # 051112-136                       www.solarwork.biz <http://www.solarwork.biz> 

"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"  

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

 

From: RE-wrenches  <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On Behalf Of cwarfel
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 9:23 AM
To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Looking for insulated #6 bare standoff

 

I just got back from being out of the office for a week+ and just read a few of these. I hope this is not redundant.

6AWG is the size that meets several tests for exposed installations. By that I mean that it is not protected.  If you are running the array EGC exposed, you would use at least 6AWG depending upon the size of the overcurrent protection device towards the charge controller/array disconnect. 250.120(C) and T250.122.

We have run into the conductor covering rating problem too. #4 can be color coded so you can use black conductor. A reasonable inspector should allow this for 6 since a lot of the non black coverings are not holding up as well to sunlight as black.  I think NEC2017 takes this into consideration and allows you to color code because of the superior performance of black coverings. 

Chris

 

On 4/20/2018 9:00 AM, Dana wrote:

That makes two of us that would like to understand, why #6? I think it dates to early grounding with grid tie systems.
I remember back to 20+ years ago when the code required that the EGC was the size of the largest conductor which with 24 volt inverters was OOOO.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dana Orzel                              Great Solar Works, Inc. 
C - 208.721.7003                       dana at solarwork.com <mailto:dana at solarwork.com> 
Idaho Contractor - # 028765         Idaho PV # 028374
NABCEP # 051112-136                       www.solarwork.biz <http://www.solarwork.biz> 
"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"  
P Please consider the environment before printing this email.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: RE-wrenches  <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On Behalf Of Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:57 PM
To: RE-wrenches  <mailto:re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Looking for insulated #6 bare standoff
 
 Dana, I understand the need to use #6 in exposed places on the earth. I have had inspectors require the same wire size that is used to the battery. I have had them require the same size as the array wiring. I have never seen them do what they are doing to you so thanks for the info....  Be well!  --Dave

The bare #8 is an EGC for #10 USE PV wire on the tracker to the array 
mounted combiner box.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dana Orzel                              Great Solar Works, Inc.
C - 208.721.7003                       dana at solarwork.com <mailto:dana at solarwork.com> 
Idaho Contractor - # 028765         Idaho PV # 028374
NABCEP # 051112-136                       www.solarwork.biz <http://www.solarwork.biz> 
"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"
 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: RE-wrenches  <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> <re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> On 
Behalf Of Hilton Dier
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:39 PM
To: re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Looking for insulated #6 bare standoff
 
Would #8 meet code? I thought that exposed ground wire had to be #6 
minimum.
 
Hilton Dier III
Renewable Energy Design
Missisquoi River Hydro LLC
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist
.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist
.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 
 

 
 
Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
"we go where powerlines don't"
http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
e-mail  offgridsolar at sti.net <mailto:offgridsolar at sti.net> 
text 209 813 0060
 
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 

 

-- 

 

         Christopher Warfel, PE
       ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
               (401)466-8978

 
 <http://entech-engineering.com> 






_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 

 

-- 

 

         Christopher Warfel, PE
       ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
               (401)466-8978

 
 <http://entech-engineering.com> 






_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
 
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm> 
 
Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org> 
 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20180421/ba636d0b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20180421/ba636d0b/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.org/attachments/20180421/ba636d0b/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the RE-Wrenches mailing list