[RE-wrenches] rail less standing seam attachments

[William Miller]

Jay:

This concept was discussed in this forum recently, so if you have been away
you might check the archives.  Cons I remember included: awkward spacing of
module support points, no wire management, confusing options for clip
selection, likely poor module alignment and poor ventilation.  There may be
more cons and I guess the only pro I can think of is saving the cost of
rail?  I have looked into it and I just haven't been convinced it is a good
idea.

William Miller


Lic 773985
millersolar.com
805-438-5600

-----Original Message-----
From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On
Behalf Of jay
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 4:27 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] rail less standing seam attachments

HI All,

I’ve got a client who is set on wanting to do rail less racking.   I’m just
working with him on overall design, hes doing the work.

Its not a large system.  16 modules on two roof orientations, ( 4 on one, 12
on the other)  with offset modules.  Standing metal seam roof that is being
installed with solar in mind,  lots of fasteners.

Hes very competent and pays attention to details.

Any positive/negative recommendations.

thanks in advance,

jay

peltz power


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org