[RE-wrenches] Array/battery relationship (WAS Battery Watt hours FLA VS Iron Edison Batteries)

Allan Sindelar allan at sindelarsolar.com
Fri Oct 14 17:55:46 EDT 2016


Dana (and I'm curious if others agree),
I used to work with 4-5 days of storage, back with modules were=20
expensive and batteries were relatively cheap. As in recent years these=20
two have reversed - modules are cheap and batteries are dear - my=20
fundamental design approach has changed. I now design around 2-3 days of=20
storage with a larger array, as long as there's a backup generator in=20
the system. I size to at least 100% of the projected winter average=20
daily load.

The batteries recharge more quickly, including on partly cloudy days=20
between storms. They spend more of their time full, thus keeping them=20
happier and giving them as much or more life, even with more and deeper=20
cycling. FLAs are easier to EQ, given the hotter charge rate. And the=20
customer spends less.

You used to live in SW Colorado, a similar sunny winter climate. Is it=20
the same in Idaho where you live now?
Allan

*Allan Sindelar*
allan at sindelarsolar.com <mailto:allan at sindelarsolar.com>
NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder (Retired), Positive Energy, Inc.
*505 780-2738 cell*

**

On 10/14/2016 3:36 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I recommend 4 days backup min & 5 days backup if budget allows of=20
> storage and Iron Edison were saying that 2 days was sufficient. To=20
> clarify - I said =E2=80=9Cmagical=E2=80=9D as in wondering if there was s=
omething=20
> special, I-E did not say this.
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Dana Orzel
>
> Great Solar Works, Inc - NABCEP # 051112-136**
>
> dana at solarwork.com <mailto:dana at solarwork.com> - www.solarwork.biz=20
> <http://www.solarwork.com>
>
> *O*- 970.626.5253 *F* - 970.626.4140   c *- *208.721.7003**
>
> *_"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988_**_" _*
>
> *From:*RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org]=20
> *On Behalf Of *Dan Fink
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 12:04 PM
> *To:* RE-wrenches
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Watt hours FLA VS Iron Edison=20
> Batteries
>
> Tom; I have never seen Iron Edison saying NiFe is "magical" -- do you=20
> have a specific webpage on their site that says this?
>
> All batteries have advantages and disadvantages, and also myriad=20
> technical issues for the installer to overcome.
>
>
> Dan Fink
>
> Adjunct Professor of Solar Energy Technology, Ecotech Institute
>
> IREC Certified Instructor=E2=84=A2 for:
>
> ~ PV Installation Professional
>
> ~ Small Wind Installer
>
> Executive Director, Buckville Energy
>
> NABCEP Registered Continuing Education Providers=E2=84=A2
> 970.672.4342 <tel:970.672.4342>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Tom Duffy <Tom at solar-biz.com=20
> <mailto:Tom at solar-biz.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Dana
>
> Two thoughts=E2=80=A6 how many days of autonomy are they quoting?
>
> If nickel Iron were this magical how come nobody has noticed them for=20
> the past 100 years?
>
> Kind regards
>
> *Tom Duffy*
>
> *Senior Solar Design Engineer*
>
> Solar-Biz-new-logo-800X300
>
> *E-Mail: **tom at solar-biz.com <mailto:tom at solar-biz.com>*
>
> */**Please note my new email =E2=80=93 You will now be able to find me at=
:=20
> /**tom at solar-biz.com <mailto:tom at solar-biz.com>/Please update your=20
> records so we don=E2=80=99t lose touch!**/*
>
> *Main Number: **888-826-0939 <tel:888-826-0939>*
>
> *Panama Office: **507-836-5588 X 122 <tel:507-836-5588%20X%20122>*
>
> *Direct Toll Free:**888-503-6772 <tel:888-503-6772>*
>
> *International: **575-539-2111 X 122 <tel:575-539-2111%20X%20122>*
>
> *SKYPE Address: **thesolarbiz (/e-mail first/)*
>
> **
>
> NOTICE: /Due to recent budget cuts, the rising cost of electricity,=20
> gas, and oil...plus the current state of the economy............the=20
> light at the end of the tunnel, has been turned off=E2=80=A6 It should ha=
ve=20
> been solar./
>
> *Confidentiality Notice*:This message including any attachments is for=20
> the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential=20
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure=20
> or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,=20
> please contact the sender and delete any copies of this message.
>
> **
>
> *From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org=20
> <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dana
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 8:56 AM
> *To:* 'RE-wrenches' <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org=20
> <mailto:re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>>
> *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] Battery Watt hours FLA VS Iron Edison Batteries
>
> Good Morning All,
>
> I have a charity case client that needs 760 to 900 AHR at 24 VDC. I=20
> have installed HUP Solar One Batteries for 20+ years and do not have=20
> any experience with the Iron Edison battery. My client went to Iron=20
> Edison & was told that 360 AHR at 24 VDC would cover the same AHR as a=20
> 760 to 900 AHR in FLA.  I understand you can use the IE deeper=20
> typically than a FLA.
>
> Math is math to me & how I have sized [successfully for years] Is=20
> there something I am missing or has my client been misinformed?
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Dana Orzel
>
> Great Solar Works, Inc -  NABCEP # 051112-136
>
> dana at solarwork.com <mailto:dana at solarwork.com> - www.solarwork.biz=20
> <http://www.solarwork.com>
>
> *O*- 970.626.5253 <tel:970.626.5253> *F* - 970.626.4140=20
> <tel:970.626.4140>  c *- *208.721.7003 <tel:208.721.7003>
>
> *_"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988_**_" _*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org=20
> <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:=20
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.ht=
ml
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm=20
> <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.o=
rg/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.=
org/attachments/20161014/27db4dd2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.=
org/attachments/20161014/27db4dd2/attachment.jpe>


More information about the RE-Wrenches mailing list