[RE-wrenches] Does a Neutral Count as a CCC

Ray Walters ray at solarray.com
Sun Apr 24 20:26:35 EDT 2016


However, in this case, Peter's installing lots of 120 vac branch=20
circuits, so all of those neutrals will be carrying full current (unless=20
they are shared neutral circuits).  Mike Holt's exception would apply to=20
240vac circuits if they had a neutral.  Further, Holt's exception would=20
not be applicable on any off grid system that was 120 vac only.

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 4/24/2016 12:58 AM, James Rudolph wrote:
> Straight from Mike Holt:
>
> *Neutral Conductor*
>
> The neutral conductor of a 3-wire single-phase 120/240V system, or=20
> 4-wire 3-phase 120/208V or 277/408V wye-connected system isn=E2=80=99t=20
> considered a current-carrying conductor.
>
> The neutral conductor of a 3-wire circuit from a 4-wire 3-phase=20
> 120/208V or 277V/480V wye-connected system is considered a=20
> current-carrying conductor.
>
> When a 3-wire circuit is supplied from a 4-wire 3-[phase wye-connected=20
> system, the neutral conductor carries approximately the same current=20
> as the ungrounded conductors.
>
> The neutral conductor of a 4-wire 3-phase circuit is considered a=20
> current-carrying conductor where the major portion of the neutral load=20
> consists of nonlinear loads. This is because harmonic currents will be=20
> present in the neutral conductor, even if the loads on each of the 3=20
> phases are balanced.
>
> Nonlinear loads supplied by 4-wire 3-phase 120/208V or 277/480V=20
> wye-connected systems can produce unwanted and potentially hazardous=20
> triplen harmonic currents (3rd, 9th, 15th, etc.) that can add on the=20
> neutral conductor. To prevent fire or equipment damage from excessive=20
> harmonic neutral current, the designer should consider increasing the=20
> size of the neutral conductor or installing a separate neutral for=20
> each phase.  see 210.4(A) FPN, 220.61 FPN 2, and 450.3 FPN 2.
>
> Grounding (earthing) and bonding conductors aren=E2=80=99t considered cur=
rent=20
> carrying.
>
> For individual dwelling units or one-family, two-family, and=20
> multifamily dwellings, Table 310.15(B)(6) can be used to size 3-wire=20
> single-phase 120/240V service or feeder conductors (including neutral=20
> conductors) that serve as the main power feeder. Feeder conductors are=20
> not required to have an ampacity rating greater than the service=20
> conductors [215.2(A)(3)].
>
> Warning: Table 310.15(B)(6) doesn=E2=80=99t apply to 3-wire single-phase =

> 120/208V systems, because the grounded neutral conductor in these=20
> systems carries neutral current even when the load on the phases is=20
> balanced [310.15(B)(4)(6)]. For more information on this topic, see=20
> 220.61(C)(1).
>
> /Grounded Neutral Conductor Sizing./ Table 310.15(B)(6) can be used to=20
> size the grounded neutral conductor of a 3-wire single-phase 120/240V=20
> service or feeder that serves as the main power feeder, based on the=20
> feeder calculated load in accordance with 220.61.
>
> Because the grounded neutral service conductor is required to serve as=20
> the effective ground-fault current path, it must be sized so that it=20
> can safely carry the maximum fault current likely to be imposed on it=20
> [110.10 and 250.4(A)(5)]. This is accomplished by sizing the grounded=20
> neutral conductor in accordance with Table 250.66, based on the total=20
> area of the largest ungrounded conductor [250.24(C)(1)].
>
> aloha and happy trails...
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Peter Parrish=20
> <peter.parrish at calsolareng.com <mailto:peter.parrish at calsolareng.com>>=20
> wrote:
>
>     William,
>
>     I agree about the subpanel in the house situation. The customer is
>     a bit eccentric, and I have tried to bring him around. And I have
>     explained to him that his approach will be more expensive. He
>     doesn=E2=80=99t care. In the end, there is no safety risk. So I=E2=80=
=99ll plan
>     for 4 branch circuits per conduit and take the 0.70 derating.
>
>     - Peter
>
>     Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D.
>
>     President, SolarGnosis
>
>     1107 Fair Oaks Ave.
>
>     Suite 351
>
>     South Pasadena, CA 91030
>
>     (323) 839-6108 <tel:%28323%29%20839-6108>
>
>     petertor at pobox.com <mailto:petertor at pobox.com>
>
>     *From:*RE-wrenches
>     [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
>     <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org>] *On Behalf Of
>     *William Miller
>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:25 AM
>     *To:* RE-wrenches
>     *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Does a Neutral Count as a CCC
>
>     Peter:
>
>     I think it is a mistake to not locate a sub-panel in the house.=20
>     Running branch circuits 45 feet to a separate building is not
>     efficient or practical.
>
>     Voltage drop:  1% VD is a choice, not a requirement. Code requires
>     3% on feeders and 5% cumulative on AC branch circuits.   I like to
>     use 1% for average voltage drop for PV because of the cost of
>     wasted PV energy.  I am more lax on AC circuits.  If I calculate a
>     PV feeder for 1%, that drop will occur only occasionally, when
>     peak solar is achieved.  Analyze your load or charging profiles
>     and look for a calc that provides the chosen VD for average use.
>     Analyzing PV energy curves over a given day, approximately 50% of
>     the energy is under the bell curve.
>
>     Neutrals are current carrying.  Try powering a 120VAC load without
>     one and you will see what I mean.
>
>     William Miller
>
>     Gradient Cap_mini
>     Lic 773985
>     millersolar.com <http://www.millersolar.com/>
>     805-438-5600 <tel:805-438-5600>
>
>     *From:*RE-wrenches
>     [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
>     <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org>] *On Behalf Of
>     *Peter Parrish
>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 21, 2016 8:57 AM
>     *To:* 'RE-wrenches'
>     *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] Does a Netral COunt as a CCC
>
>     I am working with a customer who is doing a complete remodel and
>     addition to his house: stripped to the open studs and floor
>     joists, and rafters. Not a wire in the house. We have designed a
>     14.4 kWp PV system with 16 kW of storage for backup and load
>     shifting. The main panel, inverters, critical load subpanel and
>     batteries are all going to be in the garage which is about 45 feet
>     from the house. The customer and I have identified the critical loads.
>
>     The GC is running conduit from the main house to the garage. I
>     have been given seven (7) 1-1/2=E2=80=9D PVC conduits, and I am curre=
ntly
>     doing conduit fill, ampacity and voltage drop calculations for the
>     branch circuits that represent the critical loads.
>
>     So I have two questions:
>
>     (1)Should I stick to a <1% voltage drop on all circuits?
>
>     (2)Do 120 V neutrals count as current carrying conductors? I think
>     they do, but the electrician stated quite emphatically that  they
>     didn=E2=80=99t. I thought that the derating calcs for CCCs were based
>     solely on ohmic losses and phasing was not taken into account.
>
>     Does the NEC provide guidance on this latter situation?
>
>     -Peter Parrish
>
>     Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D.
>
>     President, SolarGnosis
>
>     1107 Fair Oaks Ave.
>
>     Suite 351
>
>     South Pasadena, CA 91030
>
>     (323) 839-6108 <tel:%28323%29%20839-6108>
>
>     petertor at pobox.com <mailto:petertor at pobox.com>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
>     List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>     <mailto:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
>
>     Change listserver email address & settings:
>     http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
>     List-Archive:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillis=
t.html
>
>     List rules & etiquette:
>     www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>     <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
>
>     Check out or update participant bios:
>     www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> --=20
> *
> James B. Rudolph*
> *Haleakala Solar* *
> *
> *Director of Construction*
> *NABCEP Certified PV Installer # 091209-155
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
>
> *
> *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.o=
rg/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.=
org/attachments/20160424/857e9fa2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1460 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches_lists.re-wrenches.=
org/attachments/20160424/857e9fa2/attachment.jpe>


More information about the RE-Wrenches mailing list