[RE-wrenches] Nec 225

[Richard L Ratico]

William,

No, I mean what is your problem with complying with the request, "Show the
number of existing circuits and/or the  
disconnecting means for panel C". Why not just do that?

Dick



--- You wrote:
Dick:

I too am mystifed.  I sent a request for clarification but have not  
heard back.  It may be some kind of power trip as we have been at odds  
over many issues.  I will report back.

William Miller
Millersolar.com

On Dec 11, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Richard.L.Ratico at VALLEY.NET (Richard L  
Ratico) wrote:

> William,
>
> No direct specific experience with this, but, respectfully, what is  
> the problem?
> The code sections seem clear and not unreasonable nor arduous.
>
> Dick Ratico
> Solarwind Electric
>
>
> --- You wrote:
> Friends:
>
>
> I just received a plan correction for a grid-tie permit application  
> wherein
> the inspector is questioning compliance with section 225.  Below is  
> the
> text of the correction notice:
>
> The existing panel C in the pump house must comply with NEC 225.31. 225.32
> & 225.33. Show the number of existing circuits and/or the  
> disconnecting
> means for panel C.
>
> Has anyone ever had experience with this section being applied to a
> grid-tie system?  The inverters will be inside a pump house remote  
> from the
> main residence.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> William Miller
>
--- end of quote ---