<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Larry, Wrenches:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I appreciate your questions and comments. I think there is a broader question here: How do we differentiate between a perceived intent of the Code authors versus the actual language they provide in the Code?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Many members of this forum have commented on the forum and to me off-line about the \u201cintent\u201d of the section. I find these discussions have academic value only. I could pretend to know what the intent of the framers of the code section, but how do I prove that intent to a plan checker?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Here in the real world we all must deal with building officials who know how to read and can choose to apply that which is in black and white. Furthermore, building officials often refer to trade articles when justifying rulings\u2014articles written by those perceived to be knowledgeable. As an example, referring back to the single point of connection discussion, the interpretation for the requirement for a single point is not mine alone. This <a href="https://iaeimagazine.org/magazine/2014/01/16/load-side-pv-connections/">article</a> in the IAEI newsletter agrees with the single-point interpretation. Articles like this makes it more difficult to argue that I know the \u201cintent\u201d. See excerpt below for a clear reading of the language:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:19.5pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:19.5pt;background:white"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#222222">This section has been revised to specifically require that multiple inverters in a single PV system shall be connected to the existing premises wiring system at a <b><i>single</i></b> dedicated circuit breaker or fusible disconnecting means. This section no longer allows multiple connections to a load center or panelboard where there are multiple inverters involved. Multiple inverters must first be combined in an AC combining panel and the output of that panelboard is then connected to the single point of connection in the distribution equipment through one circuit breaker or fusible disconnecting means. See diagram 1.</span></p><p align="center" style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:19.5pt;margin-left:0in;text-align:center;line-height:19.5pt;background:white;box-sizing:border-box;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#222222"> <img border="0" width="450" height="231" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D4CE86.E9A32630" alt="https://iaeimagazine.org/images/2014_01/14a_WilesFig1.jpg"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">So I ask this forum: What evidence, other than the language in the 2017 code, can you offer me to take to my local building department that will prove to them that under the 2014 NEC the NFPA did not mean what they wrote in section 705.12(D)(1)? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks in advance.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">William Miller</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Starlight Solar Power Systems [mailto:<a href="mailto:larry@starlightsolar.com">larry@starlightsolar.com</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 27, 2019 9:22 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:william@millersolar.com">william@millersolar.com</a>; RE-wrenches<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [RE-wrenches] Multiple inverters</span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">William,</p><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">It seems this question needs to be addressed: What is the intended meaning of \u201cinstalled in one system\u201d in 2014? If you have separate \u201csystems\u201d, they should not be governed by 705.12. So, at what point does a \u201csystem\u201d begin and end? PV modules to the disconnect? ...to the load panel? ...to the service entrance?</p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Larry</p><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:42 PM, William Miller <<a href="mailto:william@millersolar.com">william@millersolar.com</a>> wrote:</p></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">August:</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The 2014 code, which the AHJ for this project is using, states the following:</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">(<i>1) Dedicated Overcurrent and Disconnect. The source</i></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">interconnection of one or more inverters installed in one</span></i></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">system shall be made at a dedicated circuit breaker or fusible</span></i></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">disconnecting means.</span></i></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Note that the language says, \u201cThe source interconnection\u2026\u201d (singular), and \u201cat a dedicated circuit breaker\u2026\u201d(again singular). This makes it obvious to me that the language says that the outputs of multiple inverters need to be aggregated and connected via<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><u>one</u><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>OCPD. I think the other wrenches missed this point.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Your input is valuable by contrasting the language of the 2014 code with that of the 2017 version. The inclusion of the phrase \u201cEach source\u2026\u201d in the 2017 code completely changes the meaning. Some AHJs will look to future code versions for clarity even if they are not yet adopted. I think this is a good thing, and I really appreciate you bringing up the new language.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The article from AEIA magazine ratifies the conclusion I drew from the 2014 code. Fortunately the AHJ is misinterpreting the section to allow the more liberal interpretation, the one that the 2017 code reflects. I find it best to contact the plan checker directly, which I did, and we are approved for multiple OCPDs. By the way, I think that article is well written and I have book marked it.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I don\u2019t know if the 2014 language was a mistake corrected in 2107, or what the thinking was of the authors. Regardless, we live by the language, not the intent.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thank you as well to all who responded.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">William Miller</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">August Goers [mailto:<a href="mailto:august@luminalt.com"><span style="color:purple">august@luminalt.com</span></a>]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br><b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Monday, February 25, 2019 9:07 AM<br><b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>William Miller; RE-wrenches<br><b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [RE-wrenches] Multiple inverters</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Hi William - </p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">In this case, it is helpful to look forward to the 2017 NEC for guidance:</p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><image001.png></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I believe it's perfectly fine to have multiple inverter breakers in your main.</p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">August</p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Luminalt</p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:42 AM William Miller <<a href="mailto:william@millersolar.com"><span style="color:purple">william@millersolar.com</span></a>> wrote:</p></div></div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Friends:</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">I have an NEC code question on an upcoming project. It is a home that has an existing 8 kW ground-mounted grid-tied system. The owner wants to add another 10 kW of grid-tied PV. My question is about 705.12, point of connection. Specifically section (D)(1). That section states:<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">The source interconnection of one or more inverters installed in one system shall be made at a dedicated circuit breaker or fusible disconnecting means.</span></i></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">So if there are going to be two inverters on premise, do the outputs have to be aggregated to connect via one circuit breaker? This might be difficult to do as the exiting inverter is connected via a different sub-panel than the one that is planned to receive the new inverter output.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">This<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://iaeimagazine.org/magazine/2014/01/16/load-side-pv-connections/" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">article</span></a><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>addresses the question.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">I would be very grateful if any of you can share any experience you might have in interpreting this section of the code.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Thanks in advance.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">William</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">_______________________________________________<br>List sponsored by Redwood Alliance<br><br>List Address:<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</span></a><br><br>Change listserver email address & settings:<br><a href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</span></a><br><br>List-Archive:<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html</span></a><br><br>List rules & etiquette:<br><a href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</span></a><br><br>Check out or update participant bios:<br><a href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">www.members.re-wrenches.org</span></a></p></blockquote></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">_______________________________________________<br>List sponsored by Redwood Alliance<br><br>List Address:<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><a href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br><br>Change listserver email address & settings:<br></span><a href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br><br>List-Archive:<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html</span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br><br>List rules & etiquette:<br></span><a href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br><br>Check out or update participant bios:<br></span><a href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">www.members.re-wrenches.org</span></a></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div></div></body></html>