<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    "Low Bid" is often the rule of the day, but so is 5 and 10 year
    warranties, 20 year PPAs, maintenance agreements, and production
    guarantees.<br>
    A bit more money spent on an inverter that lasts longer is worth it.
    <br>
    Is buying a bigger inverter and running it at 60% of its rating
    going to buy more MTBF (mean time between failures)<br>
    or should manufacturers consider selling a premier line with better
    cooling fans, and all the upgraded goodies you mentioned. (along
    with possibly an extended warranty?)<br>
    I've seen some very old inverters (Exeltech and Trace) still working
    after 20 years, but those are indoors and not at full load every
    day.<br>
    Seems we need to do more to baby these Grid tie inverters (put them
    in the shade, good air flow, surge arrestors, don't over load them,
    etc.)<br>
    <br>
    Ray Walters<br>
    <br>
    On 8/19/2011 11:18 PM, Exeltech wrote:
    <blockquote
cite="mid:1313817510.49108.YahooMailClassic@web113318.mail.gq1.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">--- On <b>Fri,
                8/19/11, Ray Walters <i><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ray@solarray.com">&lt;ray@solarray.com&gt;</a></i></b>
              wrote:<br>
              <br>
              &gt; So is it fair to say that an inverter run at half
              it's design capacity<br>
              &gt; might last twice as long? <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              It will last longer .. but as to how much longer ..
              there's no firm rule.&nbsp; Much depends on how well the
              inverter is designed and built in the first place.<br>
              <br>
              Lifetime of some components is affected by temperature.&nbsp;
              In turn, the temperature of various components is in part
              determined by the power level at which the inverter is
              being operated.&nbsp; Other factors are: 1) the ambient
              temperature of the inverter's environment; 2) the
              inverter's access to free-flowing air.<br>
              <br>
              Other considerations that come into play for component
              longevity are how closely a component is operated to its
              maximum ratings, and for how long a period of time it
              spends at the maximum(s).<br>
              <br>
              Well-designed inverters .. ones that are designed from the
              onset for longevity .. will be made to operate at their
              full-rated output at their maximum ambient temperature,
              and do so without time limit.&nbsp; They will use high quality
              components that are well within their operating margins.&nbsp;
              This means parts that cost more.<br>
              <br>
              A manufacturer may elect to skimp on the ratings of parts
              you can't readily see .. such as the voltage breakdown
              rating of the transistors.&nbsp; Lower voltage versions cost
              less, but aren't as robust, and are more likely to fail in
              the event of a voltage transient on the power line than
              higher voltage versions.&nbsp; Conversely, higher voltage
              versions tend to be slightly less efficient than lower
              voltage parts, so once again the manufacturer is boxed in.<br>
              <br>
              Can inverters be designed and built that will last 20+
              years?&nbsp; Yes.&nbsp; Exeltech has been doing it for more than 21
              years.&nbsp; Problem is .. well designed and well built
              inverters cost a little more, and the American public has
              been taught to shop almost exclusively based on price
              alone.&nbsp; I'm sure you and the other Wrenches see this all
              the time in the method most commonly used for awarding
              projects -- the infamous two word qualifier:&nbsp; "Low bid".<br>
              <br>
              Ray .. you asked very simple yet most excellent question.&nbsp;
              I wish the answer were equally as simple...<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Regards,<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Dan<br>
              Sr. Engineer, Exeltech<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              --- On <b>Fri, 8/19/11, Ray Walters <i><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ray@solarray.com">&lt;ray@solarray.com&gt;</a></i></b>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16,
                255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>
                From: Ray Walters <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ray@solarray.com">&lt;ray@solarray.com&gt;</a><br>
                Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Out of Warranty Inverter
                Replacements<br>
                To: "RE-wrenches"
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">&lt;re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org&gt;</a><br>
                Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 3:40 PM<br>
                <br>
                <div id="yiv1706892972"> HI Dan;<br>
                  <br>
                  So is it fair to say that an inverter run at half it's
                  design capacity<br>
                  might last twice as long?&nbsp; What in your opinion would
                  be the<br>
                  sweet spot of enhanced reliability but still
                  reasonable cost?<br>
                  <br>
                  I'm sure Exeltech just like everyone else (including
                  me) are being<br>
                  squeezed from all sides to keep lowering cost.&nbsp; Its
                  just ridiculous,<br>
                  and a long term player like&nbsp; Evergreen Solar going
                  under should<br>
                  be a real wake up call for all of us.&nbsp; The solar
                  industry's current<br>
                  race to the bottom is sacrificing long term
                  reliability (and our future)<br>
                  for lower $$/ watt today. I actually wonder if slowing
                  some subsidies<br>
                  might make for a saner playing field.<br>
                  <br>
                  Ray Walters<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  On 8/19/2011 12:33 PM, Exeltech wrote:
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                      <tbody>
                        <tr>
                          <td style="font: inherit;" valign="top"><br>
                            <br>
                            Making equipment more robust, yet constantly
                            lower in cost, are diametrically opposing
                            goals.<br>
                            <br>
                            <br>
                            Dan</td>
                        </tr>
                      </tbody>
                    </table>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                -----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br>
                <br>
                <div class="plainMail">_______________________________________________<br>
                  List sponsored by Home Power magazine<br>
                  <br>
                  List Address: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    ymailto="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"
                    href="/mc/compose?to=RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                  Options &amp; settings:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                  List-Archive: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                  List rules &amp; etiquette:<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a><br>
                  <br>
                  Check out participant bios:<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>

Options &amp; settings:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a>

List-Archive: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a>

List rules &amp; etiquette:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a>

Check out participant bios:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>