<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>I have REC 215 on Enphase 190. I see a lot of clipping. Every sunny day in the winter and spring. I have some data but it is only 15 minute, and I see this happen even in june. <BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Drake <drake.chamberlin@redwoodalliance.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Thu, January 20, 2011 8:23:55 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [RE-wrenches] Inverter oversizing<BR></FONT><BR>On a couple of Enphase systems I monitor regularly, the modules are oversized compared to the inverters. One system has Sharp 224 W modules and M-190s (capable of producing 199 W). The array is a ground mount at a 30 degree tilt at 39+ degrees latitude. <BR><BR>When the system was new in the autumn, I noticed two days of some clipping. Since then, none. In the summer, when the sun angle is better, the heat will keep the wattage down so clipping will very seldom occur. The modules will not be close to STC, so the
inverters should not be pushed to their maximum.<BR><BR>The same is true of string inverters. Since real power of the modules in generally significantly below the nameplate, inverters will generally not run at maximum power. When we take in all the factors affecting the actual array power, I think that 120% over sizing from nameplate wattage is generally safe. <BR><BR>Drake<BR><BR><BR>At 09:14 PM 1/19/2011, you wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">David,<BR><BR>Thanks for sharing that paper. The labeling the graphs for the 10-second and 1-minute data in Freiburg appears to be reversed - the one minute averaging seems to have more data in all of the bins above 1000 W/sq m. Basically, these graphs show that irradiance observations above 1100 watts per square meter are fleeting and disappear in hourly averages. Such occurrences are also masked to a small extent by 1-minute averages.<BR> <BR>Kent Osterberg<BR>Blue Mountain Solar, Inc.<BR><BR><BR><BR>David Brearley wrote: <BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite"><FONT face=Calibri>This reminds me of a scholarly article I came across about a year ago while doing some research. Here\u2019s a link to it if anyone is interested:<BR><BR><A href="http://www.lepten.ufsc.br/publicacoes/solar/eventos/2005/PSC/burger_ruther.pdf" rel=nofollow target=_blank>www.lepten.ufsc.br/publicacoes/solar/eventos/2005/PSC/burger_ruther.pdf</A> <BR><BR>David Brearley, Senior Technical Editor<BR><I>SolarPro</I> magazine <BR>NABCEP Certified PV Installer \u2122<BR><A rel=nofollow>david.brearley@solarprofessional.com</A><BR>Direct: 541.261.6545<BR><BR>On 1/19/11 12:29 PM, "Bill Brooks" <<A rel=nofollow>billbrooks7@yahoo.com</A>> wrote:<BR><BR></FONT>
<DL>
<DD><FONT color=#1f497d face=Calibri>Kent,<BR>
<DD> <BR>
<DD>How often were your data records? To capture edge of cloud effects, you need one-second data. Not many people gather that fast or that much data on inverters. I don\u2019t think there is that much energy in these spikes, but they are real and make some difference. 15-minute average data will completely wash out this data.<BR>
<DD> <BR>
<DD>This is also a deficiency in modeling software since most models are using hourly data.<BR>
<DD> <BR>
<DD>Bill.<BR>
<DD> <BR></FONT><BR>
<DD><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>From: <A rel=nofollow>re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org</A> [<A href="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org" rel=nofollow target=_blank ymailto="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org"> mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org</A>] On Behalf Of Kent Osterberg<BR>
<DD>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:18 PM<BR>
<DD>To: Wrenches; Marco Mangelsdorf<BR>
<DD>Subject: [RE-wrenches] Inverter oversizing<BR></FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times"><BR><BR>
<DD>Attached is a graph that I produced to document the effect of various ratios between the PV array size and the inverter size. I extracted output power data for a 1020-watt system located in NE Oregon that is on the Sunny Portal <http://www.sunnyportal.com/Templates/PublicPageOverview.aspx?page=85820a73-a347-48fb-b8d1-92e5f9b78ab3&plant=608681a7-ef60-4edb-84ff-07110db0ab6a&splang=en-US > . The data are publicly accessible so feel free to run your own analysis. Better yet, analyze the data for a system near you. <BR><BR>
<DD>Using 2009 data, I looked at how much energy would have been lost if the output was clipped at 800W, 810W, .... 1020W. I used 2009 data because there was a period in 2010 when the Sunny Webbox didn't have internet access. At 800 watts, power clipping would have happened on about 25% of the days. Yet the energy that would have been lost was only 0.38% of the annual total. <BR><BR>
<DD>The results shown on this graph aren't universal, results would be a little different in 2010, it would be different in some other climate, it would have been different at another elevation, it would be different with a different array angle, ..., and the module tolerance and inverter efficiency also effect the results. Modules in this system are Suntech 170-watt +/-3%. The inverter is Sunnyboy 1800 that should be operating at close to 93% efficiency.<BR><BR>
<DD>Kent Osterberg<BR>
<DD>Blue Mountain Solar. Inc.<BR><BR></FONT></DD></DL><BR><PRE>
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address:
<A href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org" rel=nofollow target=_blank ymailto="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">
RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</A>
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
<A href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm" rel=nofollow target=_blank>
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</A>
Check out participant bios:
<A href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>
www.members.re-wrenches.org</A>
</PRE><FONT face="Courier New, Courier"></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>_______________________________________________<BR>List sponsored by Home Power magazine<BR><BR>List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org<BR><BR>Options & settings:<BR><A href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</A> <BR><BR>List-Archive: <A href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</A><BR><BR>List rules & etiquette:<BR><A href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm" rel=nofollow target=_blank>www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</A><BR><BR>Check out participant bios:<BR><A href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>www.members.re-wrenches.org</A></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></div><br>
</body></html>