<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<div>Wrenches,</div><div>There has been some mention on this list lately of locating Soladeck and/or other combiner boxes under arrays. This has me wondering if folks are doing this only for a cleaner looking roof array or if there are other reasonable intentions<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; "> (lack of available roof space).</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; "><br></span></div><div>Other than a cleaner look, i see no benefit to doing this. (don't get me wrong, a cleanly installed array is something to be proud of) However if the box ever needs to be accessed, you have to remove at least one module to get to it, dealing with the whole 'breaking the bond' issue; having to remove the module, replacing the WEEB clip or undoing and then re-torquing the lug set screw, re-installing module, etc. If you just wanted to quickly check something in the box (voltage, torque, whatever) it is no longer a quick and easy task.</div><div><br></div>So the Canadian Electrical Code says in <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; ">Section 0.....Definitions</span><div><div><br><div><u><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D">Accessible</font></u><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D"> (as applied to equipment) - admitting close approach because the equipment is not guarded by locked doors, elevation, or other effective means. </font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D"><br></font></div><div><u><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D">Accessible</font></u><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D"> (as applied to wiring methods) -</font></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D"> </font></span><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D">(a) not permanently closed in by the structure or finish of the building; and</font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D"> (b) capable of being removed without disturbing the building structure or finish.</font></div><div><br></div><div>My interpretation here is that; </div><div>(a) the box is not 'permanently closed in', just inconveniently closed in. and,</div><div>(b) you are not disturbing the structure or finish, as you will be replacing the module as soon as you are finished in the box. </div><div><br></div><div>Many pieces of equipment and/or panels require that you remove a single piece or a multi-piece cover to access the wiring. The pv module is like a large 'cover' in this case. So i do not see this as a code violation. Do you?<br><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; ">I'm not familiar with the NEC, is it's definition of 'accessible' similar to the CEC's?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; ">Is this combiner mounting location under the array common practice for some of you, or only done when roof space for a combiner box is limited?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; ">I am going to run this scenario by one of our inspectors, i just thought i'd get some feedback from other Wrenches first. </span></div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.3333px; "></span>benn<br><span class="ecxecxecxecxEC_Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(0, 32, 96)">DayStar Renewable Energy Inc. </span><div><div>benn@daystarsolar.ca</div><div>780-906-7807 </div><div>HAVE A SUNNY DAY
</div><div><br></div></div><br></div></div></div> </body>
</html>