<div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto">Hi Mark,<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Here in Colorado, we've been on the 2014 code for about 3 years. There have been various AHJ interpretations. Unfortunately for us, its kind of ended up that on all arrays, the inspectors expect a dedicated ground rod directly adjacent to the array. This includes arrays mounted on the same building as the service entrance equipment. I've had to beg to be able to run it down the north roof to keep it out of view. If it happens that the roof you are mounting to is right near the service entrance, you can use the existing ground rod.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>I think its a very strange requirement and no one quite understands why this makes these installations safer. </div><div><br></div><div>Good luck</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 30, 2017 2:01 PM, "Jason Szumlanski" <<a href="mailto:jason@floridasolardesigngroup.com" target="_blank">jason@<wbr>floridasolardesigngroup.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Further to August’s reply, here it is:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><a href="http://iaeimagazine.org/magazine/2015/06/23/bonding-and-grounding-pv-systems/" target="_blank">http://iaeimagazine.org/magazi<wbr>ne/2015/06/23/bonding-and-<wbr>grounding-pv-systems/</a><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Jason</div><br clear="all"><div><div class="m_7651922801578014743m_7016589920452634287gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr"><span><div dir="ltr" style="margin-left:0pt"></div></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:47 PM, August Goers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:august@luminalt.com" target="_blank">august@luminalt.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Mark,<br>
<br>
The current issue of IAEI magazine has an article writing by Bill Brooks<br>
called "Hot Topics for PV System Installations." In the article, he<br>
directly addresses 2014 NEC 690.47(D).<br>
<br>
Unfortunately I don't see this article posted online, but you might want<br>
to check it out if you can find it.<br>
<br>
My understanding is that the intent of 690.47(D) is to require an<br>
additional electrode when PV is installed on structures that don't already<br>
have and electrode system such as a separate building, garage, etc.<br>
<span class="m_7651922801578014743m_7016589920452634287gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
August<br>
</font></span><div class="m_7651922801578014743m_7016589920452634287gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="m_7651922801578014743m_7016589920452634287gmail-h5"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: RE-wrenches [mailto:<a href="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org" target="_blank">re-wrenches-bounces@li<wbr>sts.re-wrenches.org</a>] On<br>
Behalf Of <a href="mailto:markf@berkeleysolar.com" target="_blank">markf@berkeleysolar.com</a><br>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org" target="_blank">re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.<wbr>org</a><br>
Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)<br>
<br>
Folks,<br>
<br>
NEC 2014 is in effect in California. I just pulled a permit for a<br>
residential system and it had a little stamp that had 690.47(D) circled as<br>
a requirement.<br>
<br>
Anyone worked with AHJ's in California who are now requiring this? I am<br>
planning to not install the electrode, siting Exception 2 and trying to<br>
say that the existing electrode next to the build is "next to the array"?<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance<br>
<br>
List Address: <a href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org" target="_blank">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.<wbr>org</a><br>
<br>
Change listserver email address & settings:<br>
<a href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/o<wbr>ptions.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wren<wbr>ches.org</a><br>
<br>
List-Archive: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/re<wbr>-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.or<wbr>g/maillist.html</a><br>
<br>
List rules & etiquette:<br>
<a href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.<wbr>htm</a><br>
<br>
Check out or update participant bios:<br>
<a href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
</div>