<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    So Pat, you stated "<i>There are simple ways to work around these
      issues</i>".  Actually, the major off grid inverter manus do not
    have a solution for this ( Magnum, Outback, Exeltech, Schneider,
    SMA)  <br>
    Can you show us an example of a UL listed system that has multiple
    inverters (over 8 kW cont.), with rapid disconnects within 5 ft? 
    I'm really looking for actual solutions here folks, and I haven't
    seen a single system ever built, much less even a simple wiring
    diagram that would comply with this new requirement. (<i>690.12(5)
      Equipment that performs the rapid shutdown shall be listed and
      identified</i>)<br>
    <br>
    Also, for every improvement comes a whole new set of problems.  Your
    "<i>What would I do in my own house?</i>" is an excellent point. 
    Personally, I would not want the neighbor's kids to be able to shut
    off my refrigerator or grandma's breathing machine with the touch of
    an outside accessible, unlockable button.<br>
    <br>
    I've been cobbling together code compliant systems for 2 decades, so
    yes, I'm sure I could scavenge relays from the EV world to do this. 
    But the days of inventing custom (non UL) solutions to meet new
    requirements should be over.  If this is to be a national
    requirement, the industry should be mature enough to offer multiple
    solutions for code compliance.  I'm all for improving safety, but it
    needs to be done as an industry: together, incrementally.<br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer, 
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760</pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/15/2016 1:48 PM, Patrick Shortell
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHcXnFUCBqdavA406sYZLkEGwVZxM5B8OLmFVeJLp+6tQ1MRGQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>Dear List,<br>
                      </div>
                      Maybe it's an over simplistic opinion, but
                      shouldnt all sources be disconnected rapidly in an
                      emergency situation.<br>
                    </div>
                    We can always do better than what the code requires.
                    I get frustrated when people go to the book, (and
                    try to hide behind the text).  instead of thinking
                    through real life scenarios.<br>
                  </div>
                  There are simple ways to work around these issues.<br>
                </div>
                I find when something is questionable, Ill call the AHJ
                and get his approval First.<br>
              </div>
              What would I do in my own house?<br>
            </div>
            What if someone thought all the power was off when they
            dragged a hoseline into my basement.<br>
          </div>
          My two cents<br>
        </div>
        Pat<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:10 PM, <span
            dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:billbrooks7@sbcglobal.net" target="_blank">billbrooks7@sbcglobal.net</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ray,<br>
            <br>
            I guess I have to step in after that acknowledgement. PV
            system circuit is a<br>
            self-defined term and therefore cannot be defined unless you
            are going to<br>
            develop a meaning that is different from the
            self-definition. It means ANY<br>
            circuit in a PV system. This includes battery and
            stand-alone circuits in<br>
            the 2014 NEC.<br>
            <br>
            The language of the 2014 NEC was a compromise between the
            fire service and<br>
            the PV industry.  Originally, the language required
            essentially module-level<br>
            shutdown. I raised the concern with the PV industry to get
            them involved<br>
            since most were not paying attention at the time. This
            language was<br>
            developed and intended to cover all circuits in a PV system.
            In the 2014<br>
            NEC, batteries are part of a PV system and therefore fall
            under this<br>
            requirement.<br>
            <br>
            In the 2017 NEC, we were very careful to carve out all
            batteries and loads,<br>
            that were previously part of PV systems, and place them in
            their own<br>
            articles. Don't shoot the messenger on this one and don't
            think for a minute<br>
            that I alone made this requirement or am alone in
            interpreting it in this<br>
            way. I did author this compromise with other representatives
            of the PV<br>
            industry so I think I know what the intent was.<br>
            <br>
            It is understandably difficult for battery systems and I
            would try to keep<br>
            battery circuits as short as possible. The 5-feet was
            intended to match the<br>
            requirement of 690.71(H)--which is further evidence of the
            intent of the<br>
            2014 NEC.<br>
            <br>
            The 2017 NEC removes batteries from the requirement, but
            they still cannot<br>
            backfeed the PV array. Energy storage systems (Article 706)
            will have their<br>
            own requirements in time--that is guaranteed.<br>
            <br>
            Bill.<br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                -----Original Message-----<br>
                From: RE-wrenches [mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org">re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>]
                On<br>
                Behalf Of Ray Walters<br>
                Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:02 AM<br>
                To: RE-wrenches <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>><br>
                Subject: [RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown<br>
                <br>
                Greetings Esteemed Wrenches:<br>
                <br>
                I've just heard back from our inspector here in
                Colorado, and we are still<br>
                being required to disconnect the batteries under
                690.12.  No where in 690.12<br>
                are batteries mentioned, nor in the appropriate 690.71
                section that deals<br>
                with batteries.  The entire reasoning behind this is
                based on a single<br>
                article written by a single person: Bill Brooks.  I have
                contacted both<br>
                Outback and Magnum on this issue, and their engineers
                are unaware that rapid<br>
                shutdown applies.<br>
                My interpretation is that I could install an inverter
                and battery system<br>
                that was charged from a generator, and we would not need
                any rapid shutdown<br>
                at all.  But according to Bill, as soon as I put a
                single solar module into<br>
                the system, suddenly the entire system becomes PV? The
                problem lies with the<br>
                term 'PV System circuit'  used in 690.12.  690.2 Defines
                'PV Output<br>
                circuit', and 'PV source circuit', but there is no 'PV
                system circuit'<br>
                defined.  690.12 therefore uses an undefined term.<br>
                Our design uses 2 inverters, so if we used Midnite's E
                panel with their<br>
                remote trip breakers, the 2nd inverter would be more
                than 5 ft from the<br>
                batteries.  If we used Magnum or Outback DC disconnects
                (that would comply<br>
                with the 5 ft rule specified in 690.71) they don't offer
                remote trip.<br>
                We have a Midnite Rapid disconnect Combiner on the roof
                with the Birdhouse,<br>
                so we are complying with 690.12, it should not be
                applied to batteries<br>
                though.<br>
                <br>
                Thanks,<br>
                <br>
                --<br>
                R.Ray Walters<br>
                CTO, Solarray, Inc<br>
                Nabcep Certified PV Installer,<br>
                Licensed Master Electrician<br>
                Solar Design Engineer<br>
                303 505-8760<br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                List sponsored by Redwood Alliance<br>
                <br>
                List Address: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                Change listserver email address & settings:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List-Archive:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html</a><br>
                <br>
                List rules & etiquette:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a><br>
                <br>
                Check out or update participant bios:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                List sponsored by Redwood Alliance<br>
                <br>
                List Address: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                Change listserver email address & settings:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List-Archive: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html</a><br>
                <br>
                List rules & etiquette:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a><br>
                <br>
                Check out or update participant bios:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <br>
        -- <br>
        <div class="gmail_signature">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">Patrick A. Shortell
                  <div><i>Licensed Master Electrician</i></div>
                  <div><i>Certified Solar Installer</i></div>
                  <div>71 Oregon Street</div>
                  <div>Long Beach N.Y. 11561</div>
                  <div>cell: 516-477-0221</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>

Change listserver email address & settings:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a>

List-Archive: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html</a>

List rules & etiquette:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a>

Check out or update participant bios:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>