<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Eric,<br>
      Not having previously heard of Rogue Engineering, I looked them up
      on the web. <br>
      <br>
      I would be cautious above using the Rhino-10 product you have
      identified. According to the product manual for it at
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rogue-engr.homestead.com/Manual_1950-162.pdf">http://rogue-engr.homestead.com/Manual_1950-162.pdf</a>, it is a 10A
      PWM controller labelled and described as being for "SLA" - sealed
      lead acid batteries. Yet its specs include a 14.8V bulk voltage -
      what they call a "top=off" voltage - and a 14.1V float voltage.
      14.8 is well up into the gassing range for a LA battery. Perhaps
      they expect that with a 10A maximum charge capacity, the current
      will be insufficient to force gassing, but these values fly
      against all conventional wisdom. <br>
      <br>
      Does Rogue Engineering know something that the battery industry
      doesn't? Or are they simply, as their name suggests, "going
      rogue"? And has anyone on this list used this company's products?
      <br>
      Allan<br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-signature">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=ISO-8859-1">
        <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11">
        <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11">
        <link rel="File-List" href="SignatureNew_files/filelist.xml">
        <o:smarttagtype
          namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
          name="address">
          <o:smarttagtype
            namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
            name="PostalCode">
            <o:smarttagtype
              namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
              name="State">
              <o:smarttagtype
                namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
                name="City">
                <o:smarttagtype
                  namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
                  name="Street">
                  <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:DocumentProperties>
  <o:Author>pe</o:Author>
  <o:Template>Normal</o:Template>
  <o:LastAuthor>pe</o:LastAuthor>
  <o:Revision>6</o:Revision>
  <o:TotalTime>2</o:TotalTime>
  <o:Created>2013-06-07T19:15:00Z</o:Created>
  <o:LastSaved>2013-09-23T20:34:00Z</o:LastSaved>
  <o:Pages>1</o:Pages>
  <o:Words>69</o:Words>
  <o:Characters>394</o:Characters>
  <o:Company>pe</o:Company>
  <o:Lines>3</o:Lines>
  <o:Paragraphs>1</o:Paragraphs>
  <o:CharactersWithSpaces>462</o:CharactersWithSpaces>
  <o:Version>11.9999</o:Version>
 </o:DocumentProperties>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>
  <w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:UseFELayout/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object
 classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
                  <style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:"MS Mincho";
        panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;
        mso-font-alt:"\FF2D\FF33 \660E\671D";
        mso-font-charset:128;
        mso-generic-font-family:modern;
        mso-font-pitch:fixed;
        mso-font-signature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"\@MS Mincho";
        panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;
        mso-font-charset:128;
        mso-generic-font-family:modern;
        mso-font-pitch:fixed;
        mso-font-signature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {mso-style-parent:"";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho";
        color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:blue;}
span.SpellE
        {mso-style-name:"";
        mso-spl-e:yes;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
        mso-header-margin:.5in;
        mso-footer-margin:.5in;
        mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
        {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
        mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
        mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
        mso-style-noshow:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
        mso-para-margin:0in;
        mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-ansi-language:#0400;
        mso-fareast-language:#0400;
        mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="5122"/>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/>
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
                  <div class="Section1">
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Allan <span class="SpellE">Sindelar</span></b><br>
                      <span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a
                          href="mailto:Allan@positiveenergysolar.com"><u><span
                              style="color:#000099">Allan@positiveenergysolar.com</span></u></a></span><br>
                      <span style="font-size:10.0pt">NABCEP Certified PV
                        Installation Professional<br>
                        NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional<br>
                        New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician<br>
                        Founder, <b>Positive Energy, Inc.<o:p></o:p></b></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">A
                        Certified B <span class="SpellE">Corporation<sup><span
                              style="font-size:7.5pt">TM</span></sup></span><br>
                        <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:street w:st="on">3209
                            Richards Lane</st1:street><br>
                          <st1:city w:st="on">Santa Fe</st1:city>, <st1:state
                            w:st="on">New Mexico</st1:state> <st1:postalcode
                            w:st="on">87507</st1:postalcode></st1:address><br>
                        <b>505 424-1112 office 780-2738 cell</b><br>
                        <a href="http://www.positiveenergysolar.com/"
                          target="_blank"><u>www.positiveenergysolar.com</u></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span
                          style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span></p>
                  </div>
                </o:smarttagtype></o:smarttagtype></o:smarttagtype></o:smarttagtype></o:smarttagtype></div>
      On 12/31/2013 2:34 PM, Eric Youngren wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CACYhghL0wQm0Xq9LvPAoXo+Aa6BMhxTC2ma-cj2Ff7_f4jn-7Q@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>Thank you Allan, Dan and Ray for your suggestions.   
            This is the kind of feedback I was hoping for! <br>
            <br>
          </div>
          I agree that the 75W of PV with 120AH of sealed battery is too
          low of a ratio of PV to storage and will not help the
          batteries last 7 years.    Unfortunately those parts of the
          design are pre-determined in the bid specs and I don't think
          they will allow us to suggest alternatives now.  We need to
          win the bid first, then maybe we can suggest some changes..  
          <br>
          <br>
        </div>
        MPPT would be great but it's just not in the budget for these
        little systems, and like Allan says these systems won't ever
        experience the cold daytime conditions where MPPT really shines.
          <br>
        <div>
          <div>Looks like Rogue Engineering in Englewood, CO will be
            able to customize their Rhino-10 PWM controllers with the
            LVD and LVR setpoints we choose.    I'm leaning towards
            Allan's suggested values of 12.0 for LVD and 13.8 for LVR.  
            I am fairly certain that many of the systems will be run til
            the LVD shuts them off, so 12V will ensure they will not be
            too deeply discharged, and forcing them to wait until 13.8V
            before reconnect will give the batteries a chance to get
            back up to a full SOC before the cycle is repeated.    Yes
            they will experience shut-downs, but I think that over time
            this approach will help them learn to live within the
            capacity of the systems and give the batteries the longest
            life possible.  That, or they will figure out how to bypass
            the load controller and run directly off the batteries!  <br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>I like the Midnite MNBCM battery SOC meter.  It's
            currently the best 'dummy light' system monitor out there
            for small systems like this.   We used them last year for
            over 1,000 small systems powering computers in schools in
            Tanzania and people seem to understand them easily.     We
            will include them in the systems we are offering for this
            tender.   <br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>Thanks again folks!  Lets hope we win the bid!   <br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Eric<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ray
          Walters <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:ray@solarray.com" target="_blank">ray@solarray.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'll chime
            back in on a few points:<br>
            <br>
            To MPPT or not:  It all gets down to the budget: I find the
            tipping point to be around 250 to 400 watts.  My small
            systems usually don't have MPPT, and as soon as I get into
            more than a pair of modules, I'm using the cheaper 60 cell
            modules with MPPT.<br>
            I like Blue Sky's new PWM 30 amp controller that also
            includes a digital meter.<br>
            <br>
            Temp compensation:  it all depends on the temperature
            variation. If its warm year round, just program the charge
            settings lower, and as Dan said KISS.<br>
            <br>
            Metering:  Midnite's Battery Capacity Meter was specifically
            designed for the African market.  Very simple LED "smiley
            face, frowny face" reading, It's cheap, and it actually does
            a decent job of tracking SOC.  Its not a Trimetric, but its
            way better than a volt meter too.
            <div class="im">
              <br>
              <br>
              R.Ray Walters<br>
              CTO, Solarray, Inc<br>
              Nabcep Certified PV Installer,<br>
              Licensed Master Electrician<br>
              Solar Design Engineer<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:303%20505-8760"
                value="+13035058760" target="_blank">303 505-8760</a><br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div class="h5">
                On 12/31/2013 11:48 AM, Exeltech wrote:<br>
              </div>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  Eric .. Allan .. and all ...<br>
                  <br>
                  Allan wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Re an MPPT controller: Nope, I wouldn't. First, this
                    is equatorial west Africa.<br>
                    It's a tropical climate with hot modules most of the
                    year. MPPT offers the<br>
                    greatest benefit when the voltage delta-T is
                    greatest: cold modules and empty<br>
                    batteries.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  *** While Allan is correct about deriving maximum MPPT
                  benefit when the PV are cold, at 75W per panel, and
                  120A-H battery, the PV are undersized for all but very
                  light-duty system usage.  Obtaining the maximum
                  possible charge current will help lengthen battery
                  life.  If two 12V 40W PV in series could be
                  economically utilized (vs. one 75W panel) .. it's
                  worth considering.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Second, any controller with MPPT is more complex,
                    and thus more expensive, than a simple PWM
                    controller.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  *** Hence my comment at the top of the suggestion
                  list:  "...  if budget and circumstances permit...".
                   If not - go with a basic PWM unit and other
                  cost-saving measures.  If they're going to hold your
                  feet to the fire on the "seven year" battery
                  performance requirement, you're going to have to limit
                  the depth of discharge, and also institute other
                  life-enhancing practices.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Re temperature compensation:....<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  *** Temperature compensation in this application may
                  be a toss-up between fully recharging the battery and
                  obtaining maximum battery life.  The choice here could
                  go either way.  If it's always warm (or hot),
                  compensation may not be needed.  In fact, it may be
                  beneficial to help maximize the recharge if the
                  controller thinks the battery is cooler than it really
                  is, which in turn would push the charge voltage
                  set-point up a bit.  Not knowing the environment where
                  the systems will be installed makes this decision an
                  unknown .  Also .. and keeping in mind that there are
                  elevated equatorial areas where the weather can be
                  cool .. compensation may or may not be a
                  consideration.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    To me the other features of the C12 - four
                    adjustable settings, removable knobs and 15-minute
                    reserve - were more important than MPPT.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  *** There is much to be said for the KISS principle.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Re an LED SOC display: agreed just as Dan stated. Is
                    there one that can be programmed to lie a little?
                    (The best of these I ever knew was the Photron
                    Batterylite, gone since around 1998. I wish someone
                    would resurrect that tiny gem.)<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  *** With several hundred units in the mix, I'd think a
                  small design house may be interested.  As long as
                  you're at it, how about adding a low-voltage
                  disconnect option into the monitor design .. and
                  perhaps even an audible alarm (with user reset).  Each
                  feature adds $ and complexity.  If the users will
                  routinely look at such an LED monitor and use power
                  accordingly, neither of these features would be
                  needed.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Eric .. there's no singular (or simple) answer to your
                  question.  If the project is going to be awarded on a
                  strictly low-bid basis .. and they're adamant about
                  seven year battery life .. you're going to have
                  difficulty meeting their budget AND achieving their
                  system goals.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Happy New Year to all....<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Dan<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  --------------------------------------------<br>
                  On Tue, 12/31/13, Allan Sindelar <<a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:allan@positiveenergysolar.com"
                    target="_blank">allan@positiveenergysolar.com</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                  <br>
                    Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Higher LVR to force full
                  re-charge in small OGPV systems<br>
                    To: "Exeltech" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:exeltech@yahoo.com" target="_blank">exeltech@yahoo.com</a>>,
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:eric@solarnexusinternational.com"
                    target="_blank">eric@solarnexusinternational.com</a>,
                  "RE-wrenches" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"
                    target="_blank">re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>><br>
                    Date: Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 10:51 AM<br>
                    Dan and Eric,<br>
                  <br>
                  Now I'll respectfully argue with some of Dan's
                  suggestions:<br>
                  <br>
                  Re an MPPT controller: Nope, I wouldn't. First, this
                  is equatorial west Africa. It's a tropical climate
                  with hot modules most of the year. MPPT offers the
                  greatest benefit when the voltage delta-T is greatest:
                  cold modules and empty batteries. No chance for the
                  former, and we're trying to get around the latter. If
                  these systems were going to a cold climate I'd agree
                  with you. Second, any controller with MPPT is more
                  complex, and thus more expensive, than a simple PWM
                  controller. Given the expressed competitive-bid budget
                  limitations, MPPT is not a smart place to allocate
                  costs. Dan is right about the weak C/rate. Spend the
                  money (if you can) on a second or larger module.<br>
                  <br>
                  Re cool batteries: agreed, although I don't know how
                  to achieve this.<br>
                  <br>
                  Re temperature compensation: as much as I push it
                  strongly here, it may not matter in this case, and may
                  be a hindrance. What's the annual ambient temperature
                  swing? Again, if it's equatorial lowlands the
                  temperature may stay around a constant 80º all year.
                  If so, TC is irrelevant. And they occasionally fail,
                  which can cause settings to mess up. Once again,
                  decide if the added cost is worth it in this
                  application.<br>
                  <br>
                  Re an LED SOC display: agreed just as Dan stated. Is
                  there one that can be programmed to lie a little? (The
                  best of these I ever knew was the Photron Batterylite,
                  gone since around 1998. I wish someone would resurrect
                  that tiny gem.)<br>
                  <br>
                  To me the other features of the C12 - four adjustable
                  settings, removable knobs and 15-minute reserve - were
                  more important than MPPT.<br>
                  Allan<br>
                  <br>
                  Allan Sindelar<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:Allan@positiveenergysolar.com"
                    target="_blank">Allan@positiveenergysolar.com</a><br>
                  NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional<br>
                  NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional<br>
                  New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician<br>
                  Founder, Positive Energy, Inc.<br>
                  <br>
                  A Certified B CorporationTM<br>
                  3209 Richards Lane<br>
                  Santa Fe , New Mexico 87507<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:505%20424-1112"
                    value="+15054241112" target="_blank">505 424-1112</a> office
                  780-2738 cell<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://www.positiveenergysolar.com"
                    target="_blank">www.positiveenergysolar.com</a><br>
                  <br>
                    On 12/30/2013 7:32 PM, Exeltech wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Eric,<br>
                    <br>
                    Allan's recommendations on both points are
                    excellent, and spot-on.<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    I would add the following suggestions for your
                    controller and system if budget and circumstances
                    permit:<br>
                    <br>
                    1) Use a MPPT model controller to enhance the
                    recharge rate under less-than-ideal conditions.  The
                    PV is already undersized for the battery you
                    indicated (below).<br>
                    <br>
                    2) If you get the job .. install the batteries in a
                    location that will keep them as cool as possible.
                     Heat is just as detrimental to battery life as is
                    failure to fully charge.<br>
                    <br>
                    3) Temperature-compensated charging will enhance
                    battery life.  However, the 75W PV vs. 120 A-H
                    battery allows for only a C/20 recharge rate at
                    best.  This is not conducive to full recharge on a
                    regular basis unless the loads are very small and
                    are lightly used.  If the budget allows for
                    opportunity to double the PV wattage .. it would be
                    wise to do so.<br>
                    <br>
                    4) A simple "stop-light" style LED voltage display
                    won't consume much power, but can go a long way
                    toward providing a visual indicator for
                    state-of-charge, especially if it's adjustable, and
                    can be be biased toward a higher SOC (in essence,
                    make it fib a little, and indicate a low SOC sooner
                    than than is actually the case).  Worth considering
                    as an option .. but easily omitted to reduce cost
                    and/or simplify the system.<br>
                    <br>
                    I wish you success on winning the project.<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    Regards,<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    Dan<br>
                    <br>
                    --------------------------------------------<br>
                    On Mon, 12/30/13, Allan Sindelar <<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:allan@positiveenergysolar.com"
                      target="_blank">allan@positiveenergysolar.com</a>>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <br>
                      Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Higher LVR to force
                    full re-charge in small OGPV systems<br>
                      To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:eric@solarnexusinternational.com"
                      target="_blank">eric@solarnexusinternational.com</a>,
                    "RE-wrenches" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"
                      target="_blank">re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>><br>
                      Date: Monday, December 30, 2013, 6:48 PM<br>
                        Eric,<br>
                    Yes, one of the classic problems with small systems
                    and less educated users. Just a small contribution:
                    it would seem to me that in this case the LVD
                    setting is as key as the LVR. What if the LVD was
                    set as high as possible - say, 12.0 V with sealed
                    batteries, along with a 13.8 - 14.0 V LVR. The
                    system would still be run until it shuts off, but
                    the battery remains at a relatively high SOC. The
                    next day the system will return to operation, but
                    with a much higher range of SOC. The users will
                    still experience shutdown, and will over time become
                    familiar with when to expect it and how to live
                    within its capacity, but the battery life will be
                    protected.<br>
                    <br>
                    This approach seems counter-intuitive, but the more
                    I think about it the more sense it makes. The system
                    would also return to operation sooner following
                    cloudy weather - in fact, it would provide a minimal
                    amount during each of the cloudy evenings.<br>
                    <br>
                    Is the C12 still made? It would still seem ideal if
                    so: bulk, float, LVD and LVR, all adjustable, with
                    removable knobs and a 15-minute reserve button after
                    initial LVD shutdown. Rock-solid reliable, too, in
                    my experience.<br>
                    <br>
                    I'd be interested in what approach you select. This
                    intrigues me.<br>
                    Allan<br>
                    <br>
                    Allan Sindelar<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:Allan@positiveenergysolar.com"
                      target="_blank">Allan@positiveenergysolar.com</a><br>
                    NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional<br>
                    NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional<br>
                    New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician<br>
                    Founder, Positive Energy, Inc.<br>
                    <br>
                    A Certified B CorporationTM<br>
                    3209 Richards Lane<br>
                    Santa Fe , New Mexico 87507<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:505%20424-1112"
                      value="+15054241112" target="_blank">505 424-1112</a> office
                    780-2738 cell<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.positiveenergysolar.com"
                      target="_blank">www.positiveenergysolar.com</a><br>
                    <br>
                      On 12/30/2013 5:00 PM, Eric Youngren wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      Hi Wrenches,<br>
                      <br>
                      We are bidding on a project to provide several
                      hundred small (75Wpv, 120AH battery) 12V DC
                      off-grid solar home systems for rural villages in
                      West Africa.  The project planners have requested
                      that the systems be designed and built to provide
                      7 years of battery life.  That seems crazy
                      optimistic to me but I'm trying to design the
                      systems that will give the batteries a fighting
                      chance of lasting that long.<br>
                      <br>
                      In my experience with these types of
                      installations, the system users have little or no
                      understanding of how to properly manage their
                      batteries and usually no metering or SOC
                      indication to help them even if they knew what to
                      look for.  So, the default control strategy
                      becomes:  run the loads until the Low Voltage
                      Disconnect (LVD) turns them off, then wait until
                      the Sun returns and the voltage rises to the Low
                      Voltage Reconnect (LVR) setpoint (around 12.5V is
                      a common default) , upon which point the cycle
                      repeats, with the result that the battery bounces
                      between LVD and LVR, almost never reaches a full
                      SOC, and the batteries are lucky to survive for
                      maybe two years.  After that the system will
                      provide a little power during the day while the
                      Sun is shining but the batteries will quickly
                      crash below the LVD after the sun goes down.<br>
                      <br>
                      So, we want to offer a controller with a high LVR
                      setting that will ensure the batteries reach a
                      full recharge after each and every LVD incident.  
                       I know the C-12 has an adjustable LVR setpoint
                      and I see one Chinese brand (Manson) that can do
                      it.   Does anyone have any other suggestions of
                      small (<20A) PWM controllers that can be
                      adjusted to not reconnect until 14V or so?    
                      Price is going to be a factor in this project so
                      they need to be low cost.<br>
                      <br>
                      Any other suggestions?  What would you use for the
                      optimal LVD and LVR in this situation?     These
                      are rural household, DC only systems with
                      primarily lighting and small device charging
                      loads.   I know that this strategy will mean that
                      they might not have any access to battery power
                      for up to a few days if they hit the LVD during
                      the rainy season and there is not enough sunshine
                      to get the battery charged in a single day.  My
                      thinking is that experience will provide good
                      feedback that will encourage them to conserve and
                      manage their batteries to avoid the LVD situation
                      as much as possible.     That's the idea, anyway.
                       I'd appreciate any advice from you all.  Thanks!<br>
                      <br>
                      Wishing you all a happy and productive 2014!<br>
                      <br>
                      Best energy,<br>
                      Eric<br>
                      <br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div class="im">
                _______________________________________________<br>
                List sponsored by Home Power magazine<br>
                <br>
                List Address: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                Change email address & settings:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List-Archive: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List rules & etiquette:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm"
                  target="_blank">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a><br>
                <br>
                Check out participant bios:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                List sponsored by Home Power magazine<br>
                <br>
                List Address: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                Change email address & settings:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List-Archive: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
                List rules & etiquette:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm"
                  target="_blank">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a><br>
                <br>
                Check out participant bios:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org"
                  target="_blank">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a><br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org">RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>

Change email address & settings:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a>

List-Archive: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org">http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org</a>

List rules & etiquette:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm">www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm</a>

Check out participant bios:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.members.re-wrenches.org">www.members.re-wrenches.org</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>