<font face="arial" size="4"><p style="margin:0;padding:0;">to my knowledge the balancing transformer cannot be used with a grid tie.</p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;">are you using two outback kvc2 meters for recording the ac sell kWh? (each 120 volt leg needs one.)</p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;">todd</p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p>
<p style="margin:0;padding:0;">On Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:33pm, "Ray Walters" <ray@solarray.com> said:<br /><br /></p>
<div id="SafeStyles1325809064">I have a related question to this. Does setting up a pair of Outback GVFXs with the balancing transformer and allowing one inverter to go to sleep at lower AC output improve efficiency? It seems we would be reducing electronic loads, but adding transformer losses. Any comments? I have a recently commissioned double Outback system with 200 AH @48v battery bank. He's reporting efficiency at 77% DC in to AC out. I'd love to improve that, as his aging array of Sharp modules seems to be under performing as well, (4.08 KW STC rated, 3 Kw actual out) I haven't gone back and done testing with my insolation meter, so I'm not sure exactly what is happening, but his overall efficiency (STC rated to AC out) is only 56% .<br /><br /> Ray<br /><br /> On 1/4/2012 7:55 PM, Maverick Brown [Maverick Solar] wrote:
<blockquote>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Please use the 90% of the CEC or PTC rating of the PV module at most.</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"> </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Among several systems that I monitor daily, I have an example 11.760kw (STC) system that has a 500Ah battery bank and it peaks at 77-80% of the STC rating each day.</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"> </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Peak is defined as the top of the bell curve that forms from the graphing watts output versus nameplate watts.</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">If I use the CEC rating (10.54kw), it peaks at 86-90% of the CEC rating each day.</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">If I go to the CEC list and copy & paste into a spreadsheet and enter the values for the STC versus PTC, I <em>might</em> find I would loose 10% (or more) in the PV rating.</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;"><a href="http://www.gosolarcalifornia.org/equipment/pv_modules.php">http://www.gosolarcalifornia.org/equipment/pv_modules.php</a> (go ahead, find your modules and divide PTC by Nameplate).</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">I also have a grid-interactive system that has a very large battery bank (2600Ah @ 48V, with 9kw STC Array) and it only has a peak efficiency rating of 69% because of the load of the batteries. The larger the battery bank, the happier customers are for outage situations, but the larger the battery bank, the more current goes into "Floating" the batteries during selling. For that system, I may lower "Grid Support/SellRE" and use Auto EQ to keep the batteries fresh...</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Anyway, keep in mind that you cannot simply assume:</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">12kw Array x 6 hours of sun = 72kwh of generation each day. The brand of PV, the size of the battery bank and even the charge controller's Absorb & Float settings can greatly reduce what the inverter thinks it can sell. With multiple inverters and charge controllers it gets even more complicated (worse).</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Good luck,</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="683282302-05012012"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Maverick</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"></div>
<br />
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" dir="ltr" lang="en-us" align="left">
<hr />
<span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt;"><strong>From:</strong> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org">re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org">mailto:re-wrenches-bounces@lists.re-wrenches.org</a>] <strong>On Behalf Of </strong><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:boB@midnitesolar.com">boB@midnitesolar.com</a><br /><strong>Sent:</strong> Wednesday, January 04, 2012 5:14 PM<br /><strong>To:</strong> RE-wrenches<br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Re: [RE-wrenches] DC to AC derate<br /></span></div>
On 1/4/2012 3:01 PM, All Solar, Inc. wrote:
<blockquote>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Wrenches,</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Once again I am trying to size a grid tie w/battery system and I struggle a little with the efficiencies of them.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">With PV Watts (v.1), is changing the DC to AC derate an accurate method for getting the output?</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Thanks in advance!</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">Jeremy</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /> If you keep the batteries charged to a voltage just above their resting voltage,<br /> say, 52 volts for a 48V system, and the battery bank isn't too large, (~225 A-hours,<br /> maybe a bit more), about 90% PV to grid AC efficiency is in the ball park.<br /><br /> That's what we figured in the early days of GFX inverters at OB. That's giving<br /> 5% for the electronics and 5% for keeping up the batteries.<br /> Different and/or more accurate information may have come along since<br /> that time.<br /><br /> boB<br /><br /></blockquote>
</div></font><br><br><br>Sent from Finest Planet WebMail.<br>