<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Don't these things add like a buck a watt to the cost of the system? If that's so, they would have to be magic indeed to yield 10%-15% more power/year depending on system costs.<div>Bob-O</div><div><br><div><div>On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:29 AM, <a href="mailto:I2P@aol.com">I2P@aol.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> <div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id="role_body" bottommargin="7" leftmargin="7" rightmargin="7" topmargin="7"><font id="role_document" color="#000000" size="2" face="Arial"> <div> <div>In a message dated 6/19/2009 9:39:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:joel.davidson@sbcglobal.net">joel.davidson@sbcglobal.net</a> writes:</div> <blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color="#000000" size="2" face="Arial">I have some clients with shading problems that may be potential Solar Magic retrofits. </font></blockquote></div> <div></div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>Ok, so I've read the pitch from the Manu, however not sure even if the published specs for shade improvement are very convincing to me.. </div> <div>Would one of my esteemed colleagues explain what it does and how it works.</div> <div> </div> <div>Thanks, Don Loweburg </div></font></div></div></div></body></html>